Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Unaesthetic high eyelid fold is a challenging problem for plastic surgeons. Several methods have been introduced to overcome different deformities. Decision-making on how to select the most appropriate procedure for each patient with diverse underlying causes requires ample surgical experience. The authors present an algorithm as a guideline to manage this situation.
Methods: A retrospective review of planned surgical correction among 368 patients with high eyelid folds in accordance with the advocated algorithm covering 6 years was conducted, graded, and analyzed using both objective and subjective measurements. The follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 5 years (average, 7 months).
Results: Of 368 cases, 232 (63.05%) were classified as having an excellent result, 96 (26.08%) as good, and 40 (10.87%) as fair. No poor results, defined as failure to reduce the fold, were found using this algorithm. The crease size before surgery, ranging from 9 to 13 mm (average, 10.345 mm), was reduced to 6 to 9 mm (average, 7.324 mm).
Conclusions: The authors propose an algorithm to correct high eyelid folds supported by a clinical study over 6 years. Surgical techniques and rationale behind the procedures are discussed.
Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010207 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!