Introduction: Needle arthroscopy has been introduced in recent years as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of knee and shoulder conditions. It has continued to evolve at a rapid rate with newer generation models making in-office integration simple. As MRI can sometimes prove inconclusive, it is worthwhile to consider these alternative options for evaluating musculoskeletal pathology as a primary diagnostic tool. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of needle arthroscopy in diagnosing intra-articular shoulder and knee pathology in a small case series of patients who ultimately underwent surgical arthroscopy.
Methods: A retrospective, single-centre, single-surgeon, cohort study was performed over a three-year period from August 2018 to June 2021. During this time, diagnostic needle arthroscopy was performed on patients with suspected shoulder or knee pathology based on MRI findings and clinical exams. These patients subsequently underwent standard surgical arthroscopy.
Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the study. There were 35 joints included, 25 shoulders and 10 knees, with a mean age of 41.88 +/- 11.32 years and BMI of 29.33 +/- 6.27 in the shoulder group and a mean age of 45.5 +/- 14.54 and BMI of 31.5 +/- 4.94 in the knee group. When evaluating shoulder pathologies, needle arthroscopy showed a sensitivity of 0.93 for rotator cuff tears, 1.00 for labral tears and 1.00 for loose bodies. Needle arthroscopy for the shoulder was found to be 100% specific for all shoulder pathologies. Needle arthroscopy for the knee was found to have a 1.00 sensitivity for detecting chondral defects and 0.80 sensitivity for meniscal tears. There were once again no false positive needle arthroscopy findings amongst the knee group.
Conclusion: Needle arthroscopy is an accurate diagnostic tool for the evaluation of intra-articular knee and shoulder musculoskeletal pathology. It can provide a potential solution for MRI-derived diagnostic inaccuracies that can lead to missed pathologies or unindicated procedures. It is less invasive than surgical arthroscopy and should be considered a useful tool in the armamentarium of orthopedic surgeons.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886505 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33189 | DOI Listing |
Background: Hindfoot endoscopy is an effective treatment for posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS) and flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon disorders. However, FHL tendoscopy, especially from the posteromedial portal, carries a risk of tibial nerve damage. A needle-arthroscopic system with a 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthrosc Tech
November 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yale Medicine, Orthopaedics, and Rehabilitation, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.
Multiple open and endoscopic techniques have been described for recalcitrant cases of plantar fasciitis. Compared with open techniques, endoscopic plantar fasciotomy has been shown to be safe and effective with decreased postoperative pain and quicker recovery, as well as decreased risk of soft tissue and neurovascular injury, while retaining the ability to provide direct visualization of the plantar fascia to facilitate proper release. Single-portal endoscopic techniques may offer additional advantages including less portal site and postoperative pain, earlier return to activities, and cost-effectiveness and higher patient satisfaction when performed in the office setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCartilage
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the quality of the reparative cartilage during second-look needle arthroscopy following talar osteoperiostic grafting from the iliac crest (TOPIC) or autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) procedure for the management of large osteochondral lesions (OCLs) of the talus.
Design: Prospective case series.
Methods: Patients who underwent second-look needle arthroscopy following either TOPIC or AOT procedure were prospectively recruited when they needed a second look.
Surg Technol Int
November 2024
Virtua Health System, Marlton, New Jersey.
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate differences in post-arthroscopic partial meniscectomy patients based upon the use of a small-bore needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope for intraoperative visualization.
Materials And Methods: Sixty-eight patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to have the visualization for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy performed with either a needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope. Prior to surgery and one-week post procedure, patients underwent peak torque isometric knee extension testing using a handheld dynamometer and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score collection.
Arthrosc Tech
October 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
In the standard approach to hip arthroscopy, access to the joint is achieved using fluoroscopic guidance to enter the central compartment of the hip using the Seldinger technique, penetrating the capsule with a needle and subsequently cannulating and obtaining direct visualization of the joint. In such a way, arthroscopists then proceed with accessory portal creation and capsulotomy, as desired, under direct intra-articular visualization. In cases with severe pincer morphology or coxa profunda, it may not be possible to safely access the central compartment under fluoroscopic guidance due to significant lateral overcoverage of the femoral head.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!