The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become popular in the medical world due to its content of growth factors and numerous studies are experimental. In experimental studies, the preparation and application of PRP are problematic and allogenic PRP transfers have been preffered, because of the difficulties in preparation of autogenic PRP in animal experiments. Xenogenic transfers and their effects have not been studied in this topic. This study aimed to investigate the effect of autogenic and xenogenic use of PRP on composite graft viability. Two composite grafts are prepared for each ear of nine rabbits. Each ear was randomly divided into three groups. After the procedure, the wound edges and base were injected with 1 cc serum physiologic, autogenic PRP or 1 cc human-derived xenogenic PRP. At 3 weeks, samples were taken, photographic and histopathological evaluations were made. The graft viability was better in autogenic and xenogenic group compared to the control group. In comprasion of autogenic and xenogenic groups, although the macroscopic evaluation revealed better graft viability and less necrosis in the group which had been treated with autogenic PRP, the difference was not statistically significant. The three groups did not significantly differ in terms of inflammation. Vascularization examined histopathologically. CD31 staining, which was used to evaluate angiogenesis, was significantly higher in the autogenic PRP group than the remaining two groups. Although autogenic PRP has better results histopathologically, the xenogenic use of PRP may be an alternative for studies, when macroscopic evaluation is necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2023.2172026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

autogenic prp
20
autogenic xenogenic
12
xenogenic prp
12
graft viability
12
prp
11
autogenic
8
three groups
8
macroscopic evaluation
8
xenogenic
6
comparıson autogenıc
4

Similar Publications

Beyond Bone Grafts: Exploring the Efficacy of Alternative Regenerative Therapies.

Cureus

November 2024

Department of Periodontology and Dental Implantology, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.

Context A vast body of published literature examines and evaluates the properties of bone restorative materials in combination with other biomaterials or as stand-alone applications. If we exclude the studies investigating the effectiveness of regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative (EMD), in all other cases, bone regenerative materials are placed on a "pedestal." Therefore, the study we have initiated covers methods whose protocol does not use bone-repair materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context and objective The main goal of periodontal therapy is to remove periodontopathogenic microorganisms and regenerate destructured periodontal tissues. Advances in biomaterials have improved the results of regenerative procedures. However, there is limited data available to determine the best material for vertical bone deformities treated with regenerative treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) via a retroperitoneum approach has gained popularity due to minimal invasiveness, which avoids resection of the spinous process and laminae. However, as challenges in grafting autogenous bone persist, artificial bone has been tested in Japan to fill the spinal cage. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains growth factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines to promote cellular proliferation and repair damaged tissues.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To provide an overview of the use of autogenous platelet concentrates (APCs) in periodontal regeneration and to conduct a systematic review (SR) of the treatment outcomes of periodontal intrabony defects by using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) compared with other commonly utilized modalities. The eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical outcomes of PRF with that of other modalities. Studies were classified into 21 categories and into five different groups as follows: Group I (1) open flap debridement (OFD) alone versus OFD/PRF, (2) OFD versus Titanium-PRF (T-PRF) Group II, (3) Comparative PRF protocols (PRF vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The focus of this study was to comprehensively assess the clinical outcomes of lumbar fusion utilizing autogenous bone grafting and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in elderly individuals.

Method: A cohort of 40 senior individuals diagnosed with DLSS, who underwent treatment at our hospital between January 2020 and March 2022. The control group consisted of 20 participants who underwent local bone grafting for intervertebral fusion, while the observation group comprised 20 individuals who received a combination of local bone grafting and PRP for lumbar fusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!