Bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy: 2022 guideline update.

Curr Opin Cardiol

Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Published: March 2023

Purpose Of Review: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is observed in 1-2% of the general population. In addition to valve-related complications (such as aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation), individuals with BAV often develop dilatation of the proximal aorta (aortic root and ascending aorta), a condition termed BAV aortopathy. The development of BAV aortopathy can occur independent of valvular alterations and can lead to aneurysm formation, aortic dissection or aortic rupture. This review aims to update the clinician with an approach to BAV aortopathy decision making in keeping with the 2022 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guideline recommendations.

Recent Findings: The ACC/AHA 2022 guidelines provide a contemporary and comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and treatment of aortic pathologies. We review the thresholds for replacement of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta along with the strength and level of evidence recommendations. We also review the various Class 2A and 2B recommendations for earlier intervention, which emphasize the importance of experienced surgeons, and multidisciplinary aortic teams (MATs).

Summary: BAV aortopathy is a common and heterogenous clinical problem. The decision making around timing of intervention requires a personalized approach that is based on the aortic dimensions, valve function, rate of growth, family history, patient factors, and surgical experience within MATs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bav aortopathy
16
aortic
10
bicuspid aortic
8
aortic valve
8
aortic root
8
ascending aorta
8
decision making
8
bav
6
aortopathy
5
valve associated
4

Similar Publications

Background: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect (reported incidence of 0.5%-2%) and is commonly associated with proximal aortic dilation. Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) of BAV have been shown to have worse pre-operative left ventricular (LV) function as well as a higher incidence of post-operative heart failure hospitalization when compared with analogous patients with tri-leaflet aortic valve disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect. Patients with BAV frequently develop aortopathy, which depends on the dysfunction and morphotype of the BAV.

Aim: The aim of our study was to compare the echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings in BAV patients, and to define the risks of BAV dysfunction and aortopathy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diagnosis of bicuspid aortic valves: CT vs. TTE.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging

December 2024

Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Bicuspid aortic valfves (BAV) are a relatively common cardiac abnormality, with an associated risk of aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and aortopathy. First-line diagnosis is via transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which may be impacted by valve calcification and operator variability. Electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography (CT) offers an alternative form of assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bicuspid aortic valve disease is the most prevalent congenital heart disease, affecting up to 2% of the general population. The presentation of symptoms may vary based on the patient's anatomy of fusion, with transthoracic echocardiography being the primary diagnostic tool. Bicuspid aortic valves may also appear with concomitant aortopathy, featuring fundamental structural changes which can lead to valve dysfunction and/or aortic dilatation over time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In this study, we examined and compared ex vivo mechanical properties of aortic walls in patients with bicuspid (BAV) and tricuspid (TAV) aortic valve aortopathy to investigate if the anatomical peculiarities in the BAV group are related to an increased frailty of the aortic wall and, therefore, if a different surgical cutoff point for ascending aortic replacement could be reasonable in such patients.

Methods: Ultimate stress tests were performed on fresh aortic wall specimens harvested during elective aortic surgery in BAV (n. 33) and TAV (n.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!