A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Anti-intellectualism amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The discursive elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Anti-intellectualism has grown during the pandemic, leading to increased hostility towards experts like Dr. Fauci, particularly on social media.
  • The study identified three main themes in anti-Fauci tweets: antagonism against scientists, questioning their motivations, and challenging their expertise, with questioning motivations being the most common.
  • The spread of these anti-intellectual messages was fueled by a mix of politicians, conservative media, and grassroots individuals, even in the face of social media moderation efforts.

Article Abstract

Anti-intellectualism (resentment, hostility, and mistrust of experts) has become a growing concern during the pandemic. Using topic modeling and supervised machine learning, this study examines the elements and sources of anti-Fauci tweets as a case of anti-intellectual discourse on social media. Based on the theoretical framework of science-related populism, we identified three anti-intellectual discursive elements in anti-Fauci tweets: people-scientist antagonism, delegitimizing the motivation of scientists, and delegitimizing the knowledge of scientists. Delegitimizing the motivation of scientists appeared the most in anti-Fauci tweets. Politicians, conservative news media, and non-institutional actors (e.g. individuals and grassroots advocacy organizations) co-constructed the production and circulation of anti-intellectual discourses on Twitter. Anti-intellectual discourses resurged even under Twitter's content moderation mechanism. We discuss theoretical and practical implications for building public trust in scientists, effective science communication, and content moderation policies on social media.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892881PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09636625221146269DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-fauci tweets
16
discursive elements
8
elements sources
8
sources anti-fauci
8
social media
8
delegitimizing motivation
8
motivation scientists
8
scientists delegitimizing
8
anti-intellectual discourses
8
content moderation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!