AI Article Synopsis

  • Data management in cancer care is complicated, especially without digital tools like Health Information Exchange (HIE), leading to scattered patient data across hospitals.
  • A study observed 84 cancer treatment meetings involving 165 patients, finding that only 17.6% had complete patient information available, resulting in unnecessary repeat tests for 15.8% of patients.
  • The research highlights the need for better information sharing in oncology, suggesting that HIE could enhance data transfer and reduce redundant diagnostics.

Article Abstract

Data management in transmural care is complex. Without digital innovations like Health Information Exchange (HIE), patient information is often dispersed and inaccessible across health information systems between hospitals. The extent of information loss and consequences remain unclear. We aimed to quantify patient information availability of referred oncological patients and to assess its impact on unnecessary repeat diagnostics by observing all oncological multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) in a tertiary hospital. During 84 multidisciplinary team meetings, 165 patients were included. Complete patient information was provided in 17.6% (29/165, CI = 12.3-24.4) of patients. Diagnostic imaging was shared completely in 52.5% (74/141, CI = 43.9-60.9), imaging reports in 77.5% (100/129, CI = 69.2-84.2), laboratory results in 55.2% (91/165, CI = 47.2-62.8), ancillary test reports in 58.0% (29/50, CI = 43.3-71.5), and pathology reports in 60.0% (57/95, CI = 49.4-69.8). A total of 266 tests were performed additionally, with the main motivation not previously performed followed by inconclusive or insufficient quality of previous tests. Diagnostics were repeated unnecessarily in 15.8% (26/165, CI = 10.7-22.4) of patients. In conclusion, patient information was provided incompletely in majority of referrals discussed in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings and led to unnecessary repeat diagnostics in a small number of patients. Additional research is needed to determine the benefit of Health Information Exchange to improve data transfer in oncological care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14604582231153795DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unnecessary repeat
12
repeat diagnostics
12
multidisciplinary team
12
team meetings
12
health exchange
8
oncological multidisciplinary
8
patient provided
8
oncological
5
patients
5
incomplete patient
4

Similar Publications

Preserving a large number of essential yet highly unstable ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats is critical for the germline to perpetuate the genome through generations. Spontaneous rDNA loss must be countered by rDNA copy number (CN) expansion. Germline rDNA CN expansion is best understood in Drosophila melanogaster, which relies on unequal sister chromatid exchange (USCE) initiated by DNA breaks at rDNA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate the pediatric Brain Injury Guidelines (pBIG) for identifying pediatric patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who may not need further neuroimaging or hospitalization.
  • A total of 955 patients were analyzed, with findings showing that the majority had pBIG 2 or 3 injuries, and nearly 40% of those who had repeat imaging showed hemorrhage progression.
  • Those meeting pBIG 3 criteria were significantly more likely to need surgical intervention or face higher mortality rates, emphasizing the importance of the guidelines in determining treatment urgency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Emergency departments (EDs) encounter substantial challenges during peak vacation periods, including increased patient volumes, limited access to medical histories, language and cultural barriers, insurance complexities, and disruptions in continuity of care. These factors strain emergency department operations, resulting in prolonged wait times, diagnostic errors, and compromised care quality. This study reviews the literature to identify patient satisfaction indicators and common challenges and evaluate strategies to improve patient outcomes during vacation-related emergency department visits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Disclosure of biological sex may impact individual privacy.

Forensic Sci Int Genet

December 2024

Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Forensic Science Institute, Radford University, Radford, VA, USA. Electronic address:

Human identification by forensic DNA profiling primarily relies on the analysis of short tandem repeat markers (STRs) and Amelogenin or other sex determining markers. The resultant DNA profiles can be compared directly between evidence and reference samples or indirectly (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Foot and ankle pathologies: how to prescribe the right imaging].

Rev Med Suisse

December 2024

Service d'orthopédie et de traumatologie, Département de l'appareil locomoteur, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, 1011 Lausanne.

Musculoskeletal diseases of the foot and ankle are common reasons for primary care consultations. The purpose of this article, which focuses on the seven most common foot and ankle pathologies seen in general practice, is to help general practitioners perform an initial radiological assessment that allows for a correct diagnosis and can then be used by the specialist without the need for repeat imaging. This approach optimizes collaboration between the general practitioner and the specialist, reduces costs, and avoids unnecessary patient radiation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!