Objectives: To examine the current state of unique device identifier (UDI) implementation, including barriers and facilitators, among eight health systems participating in a research network committed to real-world evidence (RWE) generation for medical devices.

Design: Mixed methods, including a structured survey and semistructured interviews.

Setting: Eight health systems participating in the National Evaluation System for health Technology research network within the USA.

Participants: Individuals identified as being involved in or knowledgeable about UDI implementation or medical device identification from supply chain, information technology and high-volume procedural area(s) in their health system.

Main Outcomes Measures: Interview topics were related to UDI implementation, including barriers and facilitators; UDI use; benefits of UDI adoption; and vision for UDI implementation. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, drawing on prior conceptual models of UDI implementation and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. A brief survey of health system characteristics and scope of UDI implementation was also conducted.

Results: Thirty-five individuals completed interviews. Three of eight health systems reported having implemented UDI. Themes identified about barriers and facilitators to UDI implementation included knowledge of the UDI and its benefits among decision-makers; organisational systems, culture and networks that support technology and workflow changes; and external factors such as policy mandates and technology. A final theme focused on the availability of UDIs for RWE; lack of availability significantly hindered RWE studies on medical devices.

Conclusions: UDI adoption within health systems requires knowledge of and impetus to achieve operational and clinical benefits. These are necessary to support UDI availability for medical device safety and effectiveness studies and RWE generation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872505PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000167DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

udi implementation
28
health systems
16
udi
13
barriers facilitators
12
implementation
9
unique device
8
device identifier
8
real-world evidence
8
health
8
health system
8

Similar Publications

Nonlinear processing with linear optics.

Nat Photonics

July 2024

Laboratory of Applied Photonics Devices, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable breakthroughs by leveraging multiple layers of data processing to extract hidden representations, albeit at the cost of large electronic computing power. To enhance energy efficiency and speed, the optical implementation of neural networks aims to harness the advantages of optical bandwidth and the energy efficiency of optical interconnections. In the absence of low-power optical nonlinearities, the challenge in the implementation of multilayer optical networks lies in realizing multiple optical layers without resorting to electronic components.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Limitations of NHIC claim code-based surveillance and the necessity of UDI implementation in Korea.

Sci Rep

September 2024

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Center for Medical Device Safety Monitoring, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 170 Jomaru-ro, Bucheon, 14584, Republic of Korea.

The E-Health Big Data Evidence Innovation Network (FeederNet) in Korea, based on the observational medical outcomes partnership (OMOP) common data model (CDM), had 72.3% participation from tertiary hospitals handling severe diseases as of October 2022. While this contributes to the activation of multi-institutional research, concerns about the comprehensiveness of device data persist due to the adoption of national health insurance corporation (NHIC) claim codes as device identifiers in the medical device field.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The effect of injectable platelet rich fibrin as a nonsurgical treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence.

Arch Gynecol Obstet

May 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Gölköy Yerleşkesi, 14030, Bolu, Turkey.

Article Synopsis
  • The study analyzed the effectiveness of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) as a treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence, which is a condition that has been difficult to manage with traditional surgical options.
  • Thirty-four women were assessed before treatment and at one and six months after receiving three i-PRF injections, showing a significant improvement in symptoms according to various standardized questionnaires.
  • The results indicated that i-PRF is a promising, minimally invasive alternative to surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence, with no reported side effects, suggesting potential for further research and therapeutic use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The EU Diagnostic Device Regulation (IVDR) emphasizes risk-based validation, traceability, and post-market monitoring of diagnostic devices while excluding medical services based on these devices.
  • Laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) can be used when commercial devices are unavailable, subjecting them to specific performance and safety guidelines under an ISO 15189-equivalent quality system.
  • The IVDR may lead to the disappearance of some commercial tests, necessitating urgent LDT replacements, while raising concerns about the potential loss of niche medical applications and increased costs within healthcare systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To examine the current state of unique device identifier (UDI) implementation, including barriers and facilitators, among eight health systems participating in a research network committed to real-world evidence (RWE) generation for medical devices.

Design: Mixed methods, including a structured survey and semistructured interviews.

Setting: Eight health systems participating in the National Evaluation System for health Technology research network within the USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!