AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how well the AH Plus sealer enters dentinal tubules after root canal retreatment using two different cleaning techniques.
  • Thirty-two mandibular premolars were divided into four groups for different retreatment methods, and the penetration of the sealer into dentinal tubules was analyzed using advanced microscopy.
  • Results showed that ProTaper Next retreatment led to better sealer penetration in the apical third of the root canal compared to Reciproc methods, while additional cleaning techniques did not enhance filling material removal across any evaluated sections.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the AH Plus sealer penetration into dentinal tubules after root canal retreatment followed by two additional cleaning methods.

Methods And Materials: Thirty-two mandibular premolars with single canal were prepared up to the F4 ProTaper Universal instrument and filled by a single cone technique with the addition of Rhodamine B dye to Endofill sealer. For the retreatment procedure, the teeth were randomly divided into four experimental groups (=8) as follows: Reciproc R40 with ultrasonic activation (RU), Reciproc R40 with sonic agitation (RS), ProTaper Next until X4 instrument with ultrasonic activation (PTNU), and ProTaper Next (X4) with sonic activation (PTNS). A new root canal filling was done using a System B technique, and the AH Plus sealer was mixed with Fluorescein dye. The roots were axial sectioned at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apex and were assessed by a confocal laser scanning microscopy using the method of epifluorescence with wavelengths of absorption and emission for rhodamine B and fluorescein. In the obtained images, the sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules was evaluated. The data were converted into percentages and submitted to Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's tests (<0.05).

Results: In all groups were found penetration of the AH Plus into the dentinal tubules. Statistical difference was found (<0.05) in the ProTaper Next groups in relation the Reciproc groups for 3 mm root canal level regardless of additional cleaning method used. For the other sections the sealer penetration was similar (>0.05) for all groups.

Conclusion: Based on this study the retreatment with ProTaper Next showed significantly greater penetration of AH Plus sealer into dentinal tubules in the apical third. The additional cleaning methods did not improve the removal of filling material in all sections evaluated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9868973PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v17i2.26250DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retreatment procedure
8
additional cleaning
8
sealer penetration
8
penetration dentinal
8
dentinal tubules
8
root canal
8
reciproc r40
8
ultrasonic activation
8
penetrability sealer
4
sealer dentinal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!