Background: The cavernous sinus (CS) is accessed through several approaches, both transcranially and endoscopically. The transorbital endoscopic approach is the newest proposed route in the literature.
Objective: To quantify and observe the areas of the CS reach from 2 endoscopic and 1 transcranial approaches to the CS in the cadaver laboratory.
Methods: Six CSs were dissected through endoscopic endonasal, transorbital endoscopic, and transcranial pterional approaches, with previous implanted references for neuronavigation during the dissection. Point registration was used to mark the CS exposure and limits through each approach for later area and volume quantification through a computerized technique.
Results: The endoscopic endonasal approach reaches most of the CS except part of the sinus's superior, lateral, and posterior regions. The area exposed through this approach was 210 mm 2 , and the volume was 1165 mm 3 . The transcranial pterional approach reached the superior and part of the lateral sides of the sinus, not allowing good access to the medial side. The area exposed through this approach was 306 m 2 , whereas the volume was 815 m 3 . Finally, the transorbital endoscopic approach accessed the whole lateral side of the sinus but not the medial one. The area exposed was the greatest, 374 m 2 , but its volume was the smallest, 754 m 3 .
Conclusion: According to our results, the endonasal endoscopic approach is the direct route to access the medial, inferior, and part of the superior CS compartments. The transorbital approach is for the lateral side of the CS. Finally, the transcranial pterional approach is the one for the superior side of the CS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000547 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
November 2024
Division of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
: This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of transorbital versus endonasal endoscopic approaches for orbital subperiosteal abscess drainage. : A retrospective review was conducted at a single institution of patients who underwent orbital subperiosteal abscess drainage from November 2009 to April 2023. : Of 64 patients, 44 (68.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Neurochir (Wien)
December 2024
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Background: Endoscopic transorbital approach (eTOA) has been recently proposed as an alternative skull base approach. However, its feasibility for deeper lesions can be hampered by a reduced surgical maneuverability. Aim of this study is to consider how its extension through orbital rim resection can overcome this limitation, and to compare two different techniques for its removal.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Neurosci
January 2025
Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Craniofac Surg
November 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University.
Cancers (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Background: Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a low-grade tumor of the sinonasal tract with frequent extension to the orbit and skull base. Due to its rare incidence and recent histopathological and molecular characterization, little data are available in regard to its natural history, treatment and surveillance protocol.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review in Embase online electronic databases on BSNS was made.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!