AI Article Synopsis
Article Abstract
Purpose: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts caused by different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) retainers in comparison with conventional hand bent stainless steel twistflex retainers in vivo.
Materials And Methods: MRI scans (3 Tesla) were performed on a male volunteer with different CAD/CAM retainers (cobalt-chromium, CoCr; nickel-titanium, NiTi; grade 5 titanium, Ti5) and twistflex retainers inserted. A total of 126 landmarks inside and outside the retainer area (RA; from canine to canine) were evaluated by two blinded radiologists using an established five-point visibility scoring (1: excellent, 2: good, 3: moderate, 4: poor, 5: not visible). Friedman and two-tailed Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: p < 0.05).
Results: Twistflex retainers had the strongest impact on the visibility of all landmarks inside (4.0 ± 1.5) and outside the RA (1.7 ± 1.2). In contrast, artefacts caused by CAD/CAM retainers were limited to the dental area inside the RA (CoCr: 2.2 ± 1.2) or did not impair MRI-based diagnostics in a clinically relevant way (NiTi: 1.0 ± 0.1; Ti5: 1.4 ± 0.6).
Conclusion: The present study on a single test person demonstrates that conventional stainless steel twistflex retainers can severely impair the diagnostic value in head/neck and dental MRI. By contrast, CoCr CAD/CAM retainers can cause artefacts which only slightly impair dental MRI but not head/neck MRI, whereas NiTi and Ti5 CAD/CAM might be fully compatible with both head/neck and dental MRI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186891 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00445-z | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Effect of post-processing on the surface, optical, mechanical, and dimensional properties of 3D-printed orthodontic clear retainers.
Clin Oral Investig
January 2025
School of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Phuttamonthon District, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Objectives: To address the high surface roughness and poor optical properties of three-dimensional (3D) printed orthodontic clear retainers, an alternative post-processing protocol was investigated with the goal of achieving improved surface, optical, and mechanical properties while preserving dimensional accuracy.
Materials And Methods: Samples were prepared from two biocompatible methacrylate-based 3D-printing resins (Formlabs Dental LT Clear V2, NextDent OrthoFlex) and one thermoplastic material (Duran). For the 3D-printed resins, one group was post-processed by rinsing in isopropyl alcohol, while another group was centrifuged before post-curing in glycerine.
Comparison of physical, mechanical, and optical properties between thermoplastic materials and 3-dimensional printing resins for orthodontic clear retainers.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
January 2025
School of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. Electronic address:
Introduction: This study investigated the physical, mechanical, and optical properties of 3-dimensional (3D) printing resins compared with thermoplastic materials to evaluate their suitability for the fabrication of orthodontic clear retainers.
Methods: Samples were prepared from thermoplastic sheets (Duran [Scheu-Dental GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany] and Zendura [Bay Materials LLC, Fremont, Calif]) and biocompatible 3D-printing resins (Dental LT Clear V2 [Formlabs Inc, Somerville, Mass] and OrthoFlex [Nextdent BV, Soesterberg, The Netherlands]) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The materials were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and water sorption tests.
Assessment of virtual bracket removal by artificial intelligence and thermoplastic retainer fit.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
December 2024
Department of Orthodontics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Introduction: Digital orthodontics is here to make our specialty more efficient, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) is no exception. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of a workflow involving virtual bracket removal (VBR) by AI to traditional bracket removal. A secondary objective was to compare the clinical fit of thermoplastic orthodontic retainers fabricated from 3-dimensional (3D) printed models created by each method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDoes relative bracket base area affect the accuracy of reconstructed buccal surface in the virtual bracket removal technique?
BMC Oral Health
November 2024
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, No. 14, 3rd Section of Renmin Nan Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Article Synopsis
- The study examines how the area of the bracket base removed (RBA) affects the accuracy of digital surface reconstruction during virtual bracket removal (VBR) for orthodontic retainers.
- Researchers tested 196 teeth, comparing surface deviations (RMS values) of reconstructed teeth to original ones, revealing that increased RBA leads to higher RMS values, especially in molars.
- The findings suggest that maintaining the RBA below 80% of the maximal base area ensures adequate accuracy for effective retainer fabrication.
Zirconia single retainer fixed dental prostheses for the posterior region-A novel preparation technique and literature review.
Clin Case Rep
October 2024
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babeș" Timișoara Timișoara Romania.
The principles of tissue preservation, minimally invasiveness and approaching different clinical situations biologically rather than surgically govern today's dentistry. Thus, different clinical scenarios require procedures that offer the dentist and the patient the possibility to choose the more invasive treatment options later in life. Subsequently, the case reported refers to a minimally invasive technique that treats single tooth edentulism using single partial retainer FDPs fabricated from monolithic zirconia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!