Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between intravenous tirofiban and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) receiving endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) within 24 h of time last known well (LKW).

Methods: Patients with AIS-LVO who were randomly assigned to receive intravenous tirofiban or placebo before EVT within 24 h of time LKW and had follow-up brain non-contrast computed tomography within 24 h after stopping tirofiban treatment were derived from "RESCUE BT": a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. All eligible patients were divided into SICH and NO-SICH groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore for heterogeneity.

Results: Of 945 patients included in this cohort, there were 76 (8.0%) in the SICH group and 869 (92.0%) in the NO-SICH group. The incidence of SICH was not higher in patients receiving intravenous tirofiban compared with placebo (adjusted risk ratio (RR), 1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-2.36; P = 0.07). Subgroup analyses showed that age greater than 67-year-old (adjusted RR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.18-4.00), NIHSS greater than 16 (adjusted RR, 1.88; 95% CI 1.06-3.34), and cardioembolism (adjusted RR, 3.73; 95% CI 1.66-8.35) were associated with increased SICH risk.

Conclusions: In patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke, intravenous tirofiban before EVT within 24 h of time from last known well is not associated with increased risk of SICH. Patients who are older, have more severe neurological deficits, or with cardioembolism are at higher risk of SICH with intravenous tirofiban.

Trial Registration Number: URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn ; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11579-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravenous tirofiban
20
large vessel
12
vessel occlusion
12
evt 24 h
12
24 h time
12
association intravenous
8
intracranial hemorrhage
8
acute large
8
occlusion stroke
8
randomized placebo-controlled
8

Similar Publications

Background: No-reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is challenging to treat.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upstream high-bolus-dose tirofiban administration in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases undergoing PPCI on top of dual antiplatelet therapy, including ticagrelor, in comparison to selective bailout administration.

Methods: This hospital-based, randomized, single-blinded prospective interventional study was conducted on 150 patients at Assiut University Heart Hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Current guidelines recommend the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb/IIIa) inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) only as a bail-out therapy. However, drug penetration to the jeopardised area may not be achieved due to impeded blood flow and increased microvascular resistance. Aim of our study is to investigate the impact of distal intracoronary GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor agent infusion in STEMI patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Intravenous tirofiban (IT) is shown to be potentially effective in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients submitted to mechanical thrombectomy, despite its safety and efficacy are not well established. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of IT on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with AIS due to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA).

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of IT in AIS patients due to LAA submitted to EVT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Tirofiban has emerged as an adjunct therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). However, its benefits for AIS patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety in ICAD-related AIS patients undergoing EVT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Different antiplatelet regimens for stenting versus coiling for acutely-ruptured cerebral aneurysms.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Stroke Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

To investigate the safety, efficacy and risk factors for complications of stenting with optional coiling versus coiling alone for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms (ARCAs) using different antiplatelet schemes, 2021 patients were prospectively enrolled into the stenting group (n = 967) and the coiling group (n = 1054). Four different antiplatelet regimens were used. The clinical and treatment data were analyzed and compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!