AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates the glycemic profiles of patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy (PG) and how it relates to postgastrectomy syndrome, body weight loss, and nutritional status.
  • Using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on 65 post-surgery patients, the research compared outcomes of PG with double-flap (DF) esophagogastrostomy reconstruction to those of patients who had total gastrectomy (TG).
  • Results showed that PG with DF had shorter hypoglycemic episodes and better hemoglobin recovery than TG, but did not significantly enhance quality of life or body weight loss as initially hoped.

Article Abstract

Background/aim: The glycemic profile of patients who have undergone proximal gastrectomy (PG) using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device has not been investigated. We aimed to investigate the association between postgastrectomy syndrome and the glycemic profile of patients who underwent PG and its impact on postoperative body weight loss and nutritional status.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively investigated 65 patients with CGM post-surgery. Postoperative glycemic profiles were recorded using a CGM device. To evaluate postgastrectomy syndromes and quality of life (QOL), the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale 37-item questionnaire was employed. The dynamics of albumin and hemoglobin levels were investigated at 1 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: The time below the range (percentage of glucose reading <70 mg/dl) in patients who underwent PG with double-flap (DF) esophagogastrostomy reconstruction was significantly shorter than in those who underwent total gastrectomy (TG). Late dumping scores tended to be better in patients after PG with DF than in those after TG. The body weight loss rate of patients who underwent PG with DF was similar to those who underwent TG. The albumin level at 6 months recovered to the preoperative level in patients who underwent PG with DF, but not in those who underwent TG. Hemoglobin levels at 1 and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher in patients who underwent PG with DF than in those who underwent TG.

Conclusion: Proximal gastrectomy with double-flap esophagogastrostomy reconstruction did not improve QOL or body weight loss, as expected, however, suppressed hypoglycemia, late dumping syndrome, and deterioration in nutritional status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.16228DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glycemic profile
12
proximal gastrectomy
8
postgastrectomy syndromes
8
profile patients
8
cgm device
8
postgastrectomy syndrome
8
clinical relevance
4
relevance proximal
4
gastrectomy double-flap
4
double-flap esophagogastrostomy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!