AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored the role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) and eosinophil extracellular traps (EET) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) to understand treatment resistance.
  • Researchers analyzed nasal polyp specimens from 117 patients and categorized them based on levels of extracellular trap formation, finding significant differences in eosinophil and NET counts between refractory and non-refractory cases.
  • The findings indicate that tissue eosinophilia and EETosis could serve as important prognostic indicators for CRSwNP, with NETosis being a useful biomarker in cases with neutrophilic inflammation.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the clinical implications of neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation (NETosis) and eosinophil extracellular trap (EET) formation (EETosis) regarding refractoriness in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

Methods: Nasal polyp specimens were obtained from 117 patients with CRSwNP who received endoscopic sinus surgery. Disease control status at postoperative 1 year was assessed. Refractory cases were defined as partly controlled or uncontrolled cases according to the EPOS 2020 guidelines. NETosis and EETosis were evaluated through immunofluorescence staining (citrullinated histone H3-human neutrophil elastase and citrullinated histone-galectin-10, respectively) followed by manual counting. The z-score of NET and EET counts was used to define the following four groups: low extracellular trap formation (ETosis), NETosis-predominant, EETosis-predominant, and high-ETosis.

Results: The refractory and non-refractory groups showed significant differences in the tissue eosinophil count ( = 0.005) and EET count ( = 0.029). The tissue neutrophil count and the NET/neutrophil ratio were significantly different between the refractory and non-refractory groups of patients with neutrophilic CRS ( = 0.045, 0.031, respectively). Refractoriness significantly differed among the low-ETosis (30.77%), NETosis-predominant (47.83%), EETosis-predominant (56.67%), and high-ETosis (83.33%) groups ( = 0.005).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that tissue Eosinophilia and EETosis may play a prognostic role, primarily in CRSwNP and thattissue neutrophilia and NETosis can play as prognostic biomarkers in neutrophilic CRSwNP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880302PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4168/aair.2023.15.1.94DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extracellular trap
16
eosinophil extracellular
8
trap formation
8
refractoriness chronic
8
chronic rhinosinusitis
8
nasal polyps
8
refractory non-refractory
8
non-refractory groups
8
play prognostic
8
effects neutrophil
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!