AI Article Synopsis

  • The positioning of the graft during ACL reconstruction is crucial for knee function and joint health, making accurate guide pin placement vital.
  • In a study using porcine and bovine models, guide pins were drilled at various distances from the ACL footprint center and adjusted to measure their biomechanical properties post-surgery.
  • Results demonstrated that mispositioning the guide pin (specifically 3 mm off-center) significantly reduced biomechanical metrics, indicating that proper alignment is necessary for optimal surgical outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: The anatomical positioning of the graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is of great significance for restoring normal knee kinematics and preventing early joint degeneration. Therefore, the adjustment of the mispositioned guide pin becomes extremely important. Our research aims to test the time-zero biomechanical properties in adjusting inaccurate guide pins to the center of the tibial footprint in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction.

Methods: Porcine tibias and bovine extensor tendons were used to simulate a transtibial ACL reconstruction in vitro. Load-to failure testing was carried out in 4 groups: control group ( = 45): the guide pin was drilled at the center of the ACL footprint; group I, group II and group III ( = 45, respectively): the guide pin was respectively drilled 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm away from the center of the ACL footprint. In the experimental groups, a small tunnel with a 4.5 mm reamer is made and the guide pin is shifted to the center of the footprint. All the reamed tibias were scanned by CT to measure the area of the tunnel in the footprint, and time-zero biomechanical properties were recorded.

Results: All graft-tibia complexes failed because the grafts slipped past the interference screws. Compare to control group, the ultimate load, yield load, and tunnel exit area in group III decreased significantly ( < 0.05). Regarding to the ultimate load, yield load, tensile stiffness, twisting force and tunnel exit area, t-test showed no significant differences between control group and group I, group II respectively ( > 0.05). Pearson test showed that tunnel exit area was negatively correlated with other characteristics ( < 0.05).

Conclusions: Surgical adjustment of the guide pin to the center of the tibial footprint may have significant influence in time-zero biomechanical properties in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction when the adjusted tibial tunnel was significantly enlarged compare to the standard tibial tunnel.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10225536221151131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

guide pin
20
anterior cruciate
16
cruciate ligament
16
time-zero biomechanical
16
group group
16
tibial tunnel
12
anatomical anterior
12
ligament single-bundle
12
biomechanical properties
12
control group
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!