Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Non-Hodgkin lymphomas are most frequently classified based on the lineage marker expression. However, lymphomas with aberrant marker expression as well as monoclonal Κ and gene rearrangements may co-exist which can be misleading and confusing. Primary CD20 negative diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) represent a rare entity, and they account for 1% to 3% of cases. However, some CD20 negative DLBCLs could not be classified into known variants, creating both diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma's. Primary CD20 negative DLBCL are more likely to have a non-germinal centre subtype, a higher proliferation index, more frequent extra-nodal involvement, a poorer response, and poorer prognosis to conventional treatment compared to CD20 positive DLBCL. A 66- year-old postmenopausal lady, presented with palpable, bilateral neck lymphadenopathy and difficulty swallowing. She also had left leg lymphoedema, poor appetited, fatigue and weight loss. Her symptoms lasted approximately 1 month. After histological, immunohistochemical and clonality analysis of the lymph node the patient was diagnosed with primary nodal CD20 and PAX-5 negative DLBCL with dual immunoglobulin light-chain kappa () and T-cell receptor () gene rearrangement. This unusual and unique case presented a diagnostic challenge because it was CD20 and PAX-5 negative, had dual and gene rearrangement and, it could not be classified within the known and well established CD20 negative DLBCL variants. Describing such cases emphasises the fact that lymphomas unclassifiable within known variants of CD20 negative DLBCL do exist and that range and heterogeneity of CD20 negative DLBCL continues to evolve, and pathologist should be aware of these uncommon, atypical mature B-cell neoplasms.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9846588 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2632010X221149978 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!