A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_sessionsiu0d6usrjs7pv17povo23v4gl9mtifb): Failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 177

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 137

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cost-effectiveness analysis of overground robotic training versus conventional locomotor training in people with spinal cord injury. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of different locomotor training methods for individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI), comparing overground robotic training and conventional training methods.
  • A probabilistic analysis was performed on data from a cohort of 99 participants, measuring improvements in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs associated with each training strategy.
  • Results indicated that conventional training was more cost-effective for individuals with incomplete SCI, while overground robotic training was more effective but costlier for those with complete SCI.

Article Abstract

Background: Few, if any estimates of cost-effectiveness for locomotor training strategies following spinal cord injury (SCI) are available. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of locomotor training strategies following spinal cord injury (overground robotic locomotor training versus conventional locomotor training) by injury status (complete versus incomplete) using a practice-based cohort.

Methods: A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a prospective, practice-based cohort from four participating Spinal Cord Injury Model System sites. Conventional locomotor training strategies (conventional training) were compared to overground robotic locomotor training (overground robotic training). Conventional locomotor training included treadmill-based training with body weight support, overground training, and stationary robotic systems. The outcome measures included the calculation of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EQ-5D and therapy costs. We estimate cost-effectiveness using the incremental cost utility ratio and present results on the cost-effectiveness plane and on cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Results: Participants in the prospective, practice-based cohort with complete EQ-5D data (n = 99) qualified for the analysis. Both conventional training and overground robotic training experienced an improvement in QALYs. Only people with incomplete SCI improved with conventional locomotor training, 0.045 (SD 0.28), and only people with complete SCI improved with overground robotic training, 0.097 (SD 0.20). Costs were lower for conventional training, $1758 (SD $1697) versus overground robotic training $3952 (SD $3989), and lower for those with incomplete versus complete injury. Conventional overground training was more effective and cost less than robotic therapy for people with incomplete SCI. Overground robotic training was more effective and cost more than conventional training for people with complete SCI. The incremental cost utility ratio for overground robotic training for people with complete spinal cord injury was $12,353/QALY.

Conclusions: The most cost-effective locomotor training strategy for people with SCI differed based on injury completeness. Conventional training was more cost-effective than overground robotic training for people with incomplete SCI. Overground robotic training was more cost-effective than conventional training for people with complete SCI. The effect estimates may be subject to limitations associated with small sample sizes and practice-based evidence methodology. These estimates provide a baseline for future research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9867867PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01134-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

overground robotic
44
locomotor training
40
robotic training
36
training
28
conventional training
24
conventional locomotor
20
training people
20
spinal cord
20
cord injury
20
people complete
16

Similar Publications

Aim: This work aimed to update and summarize the existing evidence on the effectiveness of robot-assisted training (RAT) in adults with Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42022371124). Seven databases and two trial registries were searched for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) addressing RAT alone or in addition to other treatments in adults with PD up to January 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Impaired balance and gait in stroke survivors are associated with decreased functional independence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of unilateral lower-limb exoskeleton robot-assisted overground gait training compared with conventional treatment and to explore the relationship between neuroplastic changes and motor function recovery in subacute stroke patients.

Methods: In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial, 40 patients with subacute stroke were recruited and randomly assigned to either a robot-assisted training (RT) group or a conventional training (CT) group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quality, kinematics, and self-reported comfort of gait during body weight support in young adults with gait impairments - A cross-sectional study.

Gait Posture

February 2025

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense 5000, Denmark; Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense 5230, Denmark. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • Body weight support (BWS) technologies assist individuals with neurological gait impairments during training, but different BWS levels may affect movement patterns.
  • The study examined how various dynamically modulated BWS levels during overground walking impact gait quality, kinematic patterns, and self-reported comfort in adults with gait issues.
  • Results showed that while overall gait quality remained stable with moderate BWS levels (10-30%), higher levels (>40%) negatively affected speed and comfort, suggesting optimal training levels for improving gait dynamics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unsupervised learning for real-time and continuous gait phase detection.

PLoS One

November 2024

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Individuals with lower limb impairment after a stroke or spinal cord injury require rehabilitation, but traditional methods can be challenging for both patients and therapists. Robotic systems have been developed to help; however, they currently cannot detect the continuous gait phase in real time, hindering their effectiveness. To address this limitation, researchers have attempted to develop gait phase detection in general using fuzzy logic algorithms and neural networks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Robotic exoskeletons have changed rehabilitation care available to people after spinal cord injury (SCI). Yet, the current evidence base is insufficient to identify the optimal dose and neurophysiological mechanism of robotic exoskeleton gait training (RGT) as an effective rehabilitation approach. This study will (1) examine whether the frequency of RGT after motor incomplete SCI impacts function and health outcomes, (2) analyze the neuroplastic effects of RGT dose, and (3) evaluate the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of delivering RGT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!