Bibliometric Analysis of the Neurosurgery Publication Productivity of Southeast Asia in 2011-2020.

Background: There is a large disparity between the quality of neurosurgical research in developed and developing nations, including the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Bibliometric analysis is an appropriate method for evaluating the quality of research in a geographic region. We analyzed the neurosurgery reports published by the ASEAN countries to highlight regional productivity in neurosurgery research.

Methods: We performed a bibliometric analysis of neurosurgery reports from the ASEAN countries between 2011 and 2020. We described the publication number, study type, and field of study of the publication articles. In addition, we assessed the correlations between the neurosurgery research productivity of these countries and the neurosurgeon ratio, medical doctor ratio, per capita gross domestic product, and health expenditure per capita.

Results: We identified 1939 neurosurgeons in the ASEAN region; 570 articles were published by neurosurgeons in the region between 2011 and 2020. Singaporean neurosurgeons were the most productive, with 177 articles, accounting for 31% of the total ASEAN neurosurgeon publications in the study period. However, there has been a rapid recent increase in the number of articles. Case reports and tumors were the dominant type and field of the articles, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the neurosurgical research productivity of the ASEAN countries and the neurosurgeon ratio, medical doctor ratio, per capita gross domestic product, and health expenditure per capita.

Conclusions: By analyzing the neurosurgery publications from ASEAN countries over the previous decade, we highlight the status of neurosurgical research in these countries.