AI Article Synopsis

  • The research paper discusses the diffusion coefficient values for twenty concrete mixes based on the thermodynamic migration model, highlighting discrepancies in values obtained through standard testing methods like ASTM 1202 and NT BUILD 492.
  • The analysis reveals that the standard methods show significantly higher dispersion in results compared to the thermodynamic model, with ASTM C1202-97 having 2.8 times the dispersion and NT BUILD 492 showing 3.8 times the dispersion.
  • The thermodynamic migration model is recommended as a promising approach due to its quicker testing process and applicability to a variety of concrete mixtures, though it still requires further testing with more concrete samples.

Article Abstract

This research paper is the result of observations made during tests according to various standards carried out on behalf of industry. The article presents diffusion coefficient values calculated according to the thermodynamic migration model for twenty different concrete mixes and some selected mixes of the codified approaches known as ASTM 1202, NT BUILD 443, NT BUILD 492, ASTM 1556. The method used here, according to the thermodynamic model of migration, allows determination of the value of the diffusion coefficient after short studies of the migration of chloride ions into concrete and was described in earlier works by one of the authors. Unfortunately, when using standard methods, the values of diffusion coefficients differ significantly from each other. In each concrete, diffusion tests were carried out in the conditions of long-term natural diffusion to verify the values determined by standard methods and according to the thermodynamic model of migration. The analysis conducted for this research paper reveals that the chloride permeability test method according to the standard ASTM C1202-97 has an almost 2.8-fold greater dispersion of the obtained results compared to the thermodynamic model of migration. It was observed that the standard NT BUILD 492 has a 3.8-fold dispersion of results compared to the method with the thermodynamic model of migration. The most time-consuming method is the standard method NT BUILD 443. The largest 3.5-fold dispersion of values concerning the reference value are observed in that method. Moreover, a method based on a thermodynamic migration model seems to be the best option of all analyzed methods. It is a quite quick, but laborious, method that should be tested for a larger number of concrete mixes. A great advantage of this method is that it is promising for a wide range of concrete mixtures, both plain concrete and concrete with various additives and admixtures, as well as high-performance concrete.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862715PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16020637DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thermodynamic model
20
model migration
20
diffusion coefficient
12
concrete
9
method
9
migration
8
thermodynamic migration
8
migration model
8
concrete mixes
8
build 443
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!