AI Article Synopsis

  • This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of palonosetron versus ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) by analyzing 17 randomized controlled trials with 1,823 patients.
  • Findings indicated that patients receiving palonosetron had significantly lower rates of retching and late postoperative vomiting compared to those receiving ramosetron, though no major differences were found in overall PON or PONV incidences.
  • Although palonosetron showed superiority in certain scenarios, particularly with early administration, both medications demonstrated similar overall prevention of PONV, suggesting more research is needed for conclusive results.

Article Abstract

This updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron with that of ramosetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A total of 17 randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of the perioperative administration of palonosetron to that of ramosetron for preventing PONV were included. The primary outcomes were the incidences of postoperative nausea (PON), postoperative vomiting (POV), and PONV, which were measured in early, late, and overall phases. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of the administration time of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and divided into two phases: early phase and the end of surgery. A total of 17 studies with 1823 patients were included in the final analysis. The incidence of retching (relative risk [RR] = 0.525; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.390 to 0.707) and late POV (RR = 0.604; 95% CI = 0.404 to 0.903) was significantly lower in the palonosetron group than in the ramosetron group. No significant differences were demonstrated in the incidence of PON, PONV, complete response, use of antiemetics, and adverse effects. Subgroup analysis showed that palonosetron was superior to ramosetron in terms of early PON, late PON, overall POV, and use of rescue antiemetics when they were administered early; in terms of retching, regardless of the timing of administration. Ramosetron was superior to palonosetron in terms of early PON when they were administered late. The prophylactic administration of palonosetron was more effective than that of ramosetron in preventing the development of retching and late POV. In this meta-analysis, no significant differences in PONV prevention between the two drugs were demonstrated. Further studies are required to validate the outcomes of our study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9866437PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ramosetron preventing
16
palonosetron ramosetron
12
postoperative nausea
12
administration palonosetron
12
preventing postoperative
8
nausea vomiting
8
updated systematic
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
meta-analysis trial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!