Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. E 104, 014103 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014103] Baggioli and Zaccone formulate a theoretical description of the specific heat of liquids by using Debye's expression for the specific heat of solids and inserting a density of states which they claim to represent the instantaneous-normal-mode (INM) spectrum of a liquid. However, the quantum-mechanical procedure of Debye cannot be used for the relaxational excitations of a classical liquid. Furthermore, the authors' formula for the INM spectrum does not represent the known INM spectra of simple liquids, and the derivation of this formula from their model equation of motion is mathematically in error. These and a number of other inconsistencies render their work not very helpful for studying the specific heat of liquids.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.066101 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!