Identification of a cantilever beam's spatially uncertain stiffness.

Sci Rep

TUM School of Engineering and Design, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, Chair of Vibroacoustics of Vehicles and Machines, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.

Published: January 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores a method for identifying variations in stiffness within structures through non-destructive techniques, using simulated responses from a cantilever beam under static and dynamic loading.
  • Bayesian inference and Karhunen-Loève expansions are employed to analyze stiffness randomness and measurement noise, leading to a new method that leverages resonance frequencies.
  • Results indicate that static analysis generally offers better accuracy than modal analysis, though accuracy may vary based on location along the beam, while static procedures result in lower errors compared to dynamic approaches when considering noise levels.

Article Abstract

This study identifies non-homogeneous stiffnesses in a non-destructive manner from simulated noisy measurements of a structural response. The finite element method serves as a discretization for the respective cantilever beam example problems: static loading and modal analysis. Karhunen-Loève expansions represent the stiffness random fields. We solve the inverse problems using Bayesian inference on the Karhunen-Loève coefficients, hereby introducing a novel resonance frequency method. The flexible descriptions of both the structural stiffness uncertainty and the measurement noise characteristics allow for straightforward adoption to measurement setups and a range of non-homogeneous materials. Evaluating the inversion performance for varying stiffness covariance functions shows that the static analysis procedure outperforms the modal analysis procedure in a mean sense. However, the solution quality depends on the position within the beam for the static analysis approach, while the confidence interval height remains constant along the beam for the modal analysis. An investigation of the effect of the signal-to-noise ratio reveals that the static loading procedure yields lower errors than the dynamic procedure for the chosen configuration with ideal boundary conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860023PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27755-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

modal analysis
12
static loading
8
static analysis
8
analysis procedure
8
analysis
5
identification cantilever
4
cantilever beam's
4
beam's spatially
4
spatially uncertain
4
stiffness
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!