Background: Apatinib is approved in China for the treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma that had progressed or relapsed after standard systemic chemotherapy treatments. However, the effectiveness of Apatinib under real-world condition has not been evaluated and the drug performance under ideal and controlled circumstances has not been validated. In fact, genetic factors, poor healthcare access, social economic status, comorbidities compliance and other factors play significant role in drug performance under "real-world" conditions. Real-world experience can help validate the safety and efficacy of apatinib.
Methods: In this observational, prospective study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of Apatinib in patient treated in China. Between March 2018 and March 2019, a total of 943 patients with gastric cancer treated with Apatinib were enrolled. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 were used to evaluate efficacy and adverse effects.
Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.65 months (5.22-6.05 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.47 months (10.41-12.52 months). Apatinib in combination with more than two agents was superior to single agent apatinib in overall response rate (ORR) [18.18% 9.43%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-5.90] and disease control rate (DCR) (82.82% 77.87%, 95% CI: 1.21-2.59). Apatinib in combination with single agent chemotherapy was also superior to apatinib alone with DCR (86.29% 77.87%, 95% CI: 1.47-2.99) irrespective of the dose (250 or 500 mg). In the patient cohort who received a starting dose of 250 mg, the DCRs of the combined treatment and monotherapy groups were 86.22% 80.00% (95% CI: 1.18-3.09), respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia, anorexia and thrombocytopenia (66.28%, 37.75%, 36.06%, respectively).
Conclusions: Efficacy of Apatinib in this observational study is promising and toxicities are manageable. Combination of Apatinib with chemotherapy agents has a higher response rate and better disease control at the expense of increased serious adverse events. Better OS can be achieved by receiving apatinib treatment earlier. As a supplement and further validation of explanatory randomized controlled trials, the real-world study reflects the real efficacy of apatinib in practical application.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843423 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-5995 | DOI Listing |
Front Oncol
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy characterized by both exocrine and neuroendocrine components. Treatment options for metastatic cases are limited, with typical therapeutic approaches involving a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. A 68-year-old male with metastatic gastric MANEC was treated with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy, including S-1, apatinib, cadonilimab, and paclitaxel.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCell Biochem Biophys
December 2024
Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Bozhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Bozhou, Anhui Province, China.
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of apatinib (APT) mesylate on the growth, migration ability, and underlying mechanisms in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cell lines Kyse30 and Kyse150. Additionally, the anti-metastatic effects of APT mesylate were further validated in a nude mouse xenograft metastasis model. In vitro, APT mesylate treatment significantly reduced cell viability and migration ability in both cell lines in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Pulm Med
December 2024
Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Objectives: There are currently various tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based regimens available, and it can be challenging for clinicians to determine the most effective and safe option due to the lack of direct comparisons between these regimens. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of distinct regimens to determine the optimal regimen for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making.
Materials And Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and international conference databases were comprehensively searched from their inception to 02 April 2024 for collecting data regarding efficacy and safety from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Front Immunol
December 2024
Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, ;China.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Oncol
November 2024
Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!