AI Article Synopsis

  • The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is calculated using blood levels of lymphocytes and albumin and helps predict outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with specific drugs (atezolizumab plus bevacizumab).
  • A study involving 871 HCC patients showed that a PNI score of 41 can distinguish between low and high PNI groups, with high PNI linked to significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • High PNI patients exhibited better disease control rates compared to low PNI patients, confirming that PNI is an important independent factor for predicting treatment success in HCC.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a multiparametric score introduced by Onodera based on the blood levels of lymphocytes and albumin in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Regarding hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its prognostic role has been shown in patients treated with sorafenib and lenvatinib. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the association between clinical outcomes and PNI in patients being treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Methods: The overall cohort of this multicentric study included 871 consecutive HCC patients from 5 countries treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in first-line therapy. The PNI was calculated as follows: 10 × serum albumin concentration (g/dL) + 0.005 × peripheral lymphocyte count (number/mm3).

Results: Data regarding lymphocyte counts and albumin levels were available for 773 patients; therefore, these patients were included in the final analysis. The cut-off point of the PNI was determined to be 41 by receiver operating characteristic analysis. 268 patients (34.7%) were categorized as the PNI-low group, while the remaining 505 (65.3%) patients as the PNI-high group. At the univariate analysis, high PNI was associated with longer overall survival (OS) (22.5 vs. 10.1 months, HR 0.34, p <0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (8.7 vs. 5.8 months, HR 0.63, p <0.01) compared to patients with low PNI. At the multivariate analysis, high versus low PNI resulted as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.49, p <0.01) and PFS (HR 0.82, p = 0.01). There was no difference in objective response rate between the two groups (high 26.1% vs. low 19.8%, p = 0.09), while disease control rate was significantly higher in the PNI-high group (76.8% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion: PNI is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in HCC patients on first-line treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000528818DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treated atezolizumab
12
prognostic nutritional
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
atezolizumab bevacizumab
8
patients
8
patients treated
8
pni
5
role prognostic
4
nutritional predicting
4
predicting survival
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!