Moral dumbfounding occurs when people maintain a moral judgment even though they cannot provide a reason for this judgment. Dumbfounded responding may include admitting to not having reasons, or the use of unsupported declarations ("It's just wrong") as justification for a judgment. Published evidence for dumbfounding has drawn exclusively on samples of WEIRD backgrounds (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic), and it remains unclear to what extent the phenomenon is generalizable to other populations. Furthermore, the theoretical implications of moral dumbfounding have been disputed in recent years. In three studies we apply a standardized moral dumbfounding task, and show evidence for moral dumbfounding in a Chinese sample (Study 1, N = 165), an Indian sample (Study 2, N = 181), and a mixed sample primarily (but not exclusively) from North Africa and the Middle East (MENA region, Study 3, N = 264). These findings are consistent with a categorization theories of moral judgment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284959 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01386-z | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Moral Intuitions Stigmatizing Practices and Stigmatizing Practices: How Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory Relates to Infectious Disease Stigma.
Public Health Ethics
April 2023
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Animals in Science and Society, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Despite extensive stigma mitigation efforts, infectious disease stigma remains common. So far, little attention has been paid to the moral psychology of stigmatizing practices (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJust wrong? Or just WEIRD? Investigating the prevalence of moral dumbfounding in non-Western samples.
Mem Cognit
July 2023
Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, Dubai, UAE.
Moral dumbfounding occurs when people maintain a moral judgment even though they cannot provide a reason for this judgment. Dumbfounded responding may include admitting to not having reasons, or the use of unsupported declarations ("It's just wrong") as justification for a judgment. Published evidence for dumbfounding has drawn exclusively on samples of WEIRD backgrounds (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic), and it remains unclear to what extent the phenomenon is generalizable to other populations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMoral Judgments.
Annu Rev Psychol
January 2021
Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA; email:
Research on morality has increased rapidly over the past 10 years. At the center of this research are moral judgments-evaluative judgments that a perceiver makes in response to a moral norm violation. But there is substantial diversity in what has been called moral judgment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCommodification and Human Interests.
J Bioeth Inq
September 2018
Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
In Markets Without Limits and a series of related papers, Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski argue that it is morally permissible to buy and sell anything that it is morally permissible to possess and exchange outside of the market. Accordingly, we should (Brennan and Jaworski argue) open markets in "contested commodities" including blood, gametes, surrogacy services, and transplantable organs. This paper clarifies some important aspects of the case for market boundaries and in so doing shows why there are in fact moral limits to the market.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
Cognition
January 2018
Department of Psychology, Macalester College, 1600 Grand Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55105, United States. Electronic address:
Two paradigm-shifting ideas have gained widespread influence in current accounts of moral cognition: (a) that moral judgments are pluralistic, extending beyond domains of harm and fairness, and (b) that people's judgments are driven primarily by intuition, such that people are "morally dumbfounded" about the reasons behind their own judgments. An ongoing debate has emerged regarding the former claim of moral pluralism, with opposing sides in disagreement about whether moral judgments are best understood as reflecting multiple moral domains vs. a single moral domain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!