Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study aimed to assess the image quality and accuracy of respiratory-gated real-time two-dimensional (2D) cine incorporating deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for the quantification of biventricular volumes and function compared with those of the standard reference, that is, breath-hold 2D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine, in an adult population. Twenty-four patients (15 men, mean age 50.7 ± 16.5 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance for clinical indications, and 2D DLR and bSSFP cine were acquired on the short-axis view. The image quality scores were based on three main criteria: blood-to-myocardial contrast, endocardial edge delineation, and presence of motion artifacts throughout the cardiac cycle. Biventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular mass (LVM) were analyzed. The 2D DLR cine had significantly shorter scan time than bSSFP (41.0 ± 11.3 s vs. 327.6 ± 65.8 s; p < 0.0001). Despite an analysis of endocardial edge definition and motion artifacts showed significant impairment using DLR cine compared with bSSFP (p < 0.01), the two sequences demonstrated no significant difference in terms of biventricular EDV, ESV, SV, and EF (p > 0.05). Moreover, the linear regression yielded good agreement between the two techniques (r ≥ 0.76). However, the LVM was underestimated for DLR cine (109.8 ± 34.6 g) compared with that for bSSFP (116.2 ± 40.2 g; p = 0.0291). Respiratory-gated 2D DLR cine is a reliable technique that could be used in the evaluation of biventricular volumes and function in an adult population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02793-2 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!