Analysis of maxillary arch morphology and its relationship with upper airway in mouth breathing subjects with different sagittal growth patterns.

Objective: This three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) study assessed pharyngeal airway and maxillary arch in mouth breathing subjects with different skeletal classifications and analyzed the factors associated with the upper airway morphological variations in mouth breathing (MB) and nasal breathing (NB) subjects.

Methods: One hundred and five subjects (52 MB and 53 NB children), divided into three skeletal groups: Class I (1° ≤ ANB° ≤ 5°), Class II (ANB° >5°), and Class III (ANB°<1°). An independent t-test and one-way ANOVA test were utilized in the group analysis of normal distributed data. The linear multiple regression test was applied to create a model for the airway volumes based on the maxillary arch parameters in different skeletal groups.

Results: In three skeletal groups, NB individuals had greater oropharyngeal airway volume (OPV) and total pharyngeal airway volume (TPV) than MB. Maxillary arch parameters of intermolar width (IMW), intercanine width (ICW), and maxillary width of canines (MWC) were larger in NB participants than in MB subjects. In the MB group, we discovered that Class II individuals had lower NPV (nasopharyngeal airway volume) than Class I and Class III. MWC was lower in Class II subjects compared to Class I and Class III in both the NB and MB groups.

Conclusion: NB individuals had greater pharyngeal airway and maxillary arch parameters than MB subjects. Our model equation revealed that the inter-molar width (IMW) and palatal area (PA) parameters were the strongest predictors of total pharyngeal airway volume (TPV) in the skeletal Class II and Class I groups.