Background: Subcuticular suture has proven to reduce superficial incisional SSI (si-SSI) in clean surgery. However, question remains regarding clean-contaminated procedures. The aim of this study is to assess if subcuticular suture is superior to staples in reducing si-SSI incidence in elective HBP surgery.
Methods: Single-centre, open-label, parallel, pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted at a referral tertiary Hospital between January 2020 and April 2022. Patients eligible for elective HBP surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to subcuticular suture or surgical staples wound closure using a minimisation method based on previously confirmed risk factors. The primary endpoint was the incidence of si-SSI. Considered secondary endpoints were major postoperative morbidity in both groups, additional wound complications, median hospital length of stay and need for re-hospitalisation.
Results: Of the 379 patients, 346 patients were randomly assigned to receive skin closure with staples (n = 173) or subcuticular suture (n = 173). After further exclusion of 11 participants, 167 and 168 patients, respectively in the control and the experimental group received their allocated intervention. For the primary endpoint, no significant differences in si-SSI rate were found: 17 (9.82%) staples group vs. 8 (4.62%) in subcuticular suture group (p = 0.062). Subset analysis confirmed absence of significant differences. As for secondary endpoints, overall wound complications did not differ significantly between two procedures: 19 (10.98%) vs. 10 (6.35%) (p = 0.127). There were no treatment related adverse events. However, occurrence of si-SSI contributed to major postoperative morbidity in both groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018) and to a substantially prolonged postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.015).
Conclusions: Subcuticular suture might offer a relative benefit for skin closure reducing incidence of si-SSI after elective HBP surgery, although this was found not to be clinically relevant. Yet, this should not be interpreted as equivalence among both treatments. Therefore, wound closure strategy should not be based only on these grounds.
Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN Registry number ISRCTN37315612 (registration date: 14/01/2020).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837932 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01911-0 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
December 2024
Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Introduction Cosmetic surgery has advanced significantly, with wound closure techniques crucial for determining aesthetic and healing outcomes. Recently, cyanoacrylate glue and subcuticular sutures have gained attention for their unique benefits in cosmetic procedures. Cyanoacrylate glue, a non-invasive tissue adhesive, facilitates faster wound closure with minimal trauma, while subcuticular sutures offer durable, concealed closures, particularly suited for areas under mechanical stress.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Surg Educ
January 2025
Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Purpose: Use of video-based education (VBE) to teach surgical skills has increased rapidly and been shown to accelerate students' and residents' time to satisfactory skill acquisition while also improving trainees' satisfaction. However, its implementation is limited by logistical factors such as: video quality, view obstruction, and excessive motion. We aim to study the feasibility of using VBE to teach medical students basic suturing skills.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vasc Surg
November 2024
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CLEVER), UC San Diego (UCSD), San Diego, CA. Electronic address:
Objective: Wound complications are one of the major sources of morbidity after open vascular procedures, especially lower extremity bypass (LEB). The preferred skin closure method is based on surgeon preference. Because no data clearly demonstrates the superiority of one method over the other, we aimed to compare outcomes of staples vs sutures for skin closure after LEB.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dtsch Dermatol Ges
November 2024
MVZ Dermatologie am Neuen Wall, Poststr. 2, 20354 Hamburg.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!