Background: Enhancing the quality of life of people with a lower limb amputation is critical in prosthetic development and rehabilitation. Yet, no overview is available concerning the impact of passive, quasi-passive and active ankle-foot prostheses on quality of life.
Objective: To systematically review the therapeutic benefits of performing daily activities with passive, quasi-passive and active ankle-foot prostheses in people with a lower limb amputation.
Methods: We searched the Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus and Pedro databases, and backward citations until November 3, 2021. Only English-written randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional, cross-over and cohort studies were included when the population comprised individuals with a unilateral transfemoral or transtibial amputation, wearing passive, quasi-passive or active ankle-foot prostheses. The intervention and outcome measures had to include any aspect of quality of life assessed while performing daily activities. We synthesised the participants' characteristics, type of prosthesis, intervention, outcome and main results, and conducted risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42021290189.
Results: We identified 4281 records and included 34 studies in total. Results indicate that quasi-passive and active prostheses are favoured over passive prostheses based on biomechanical, physiological, performance and subjective measures in the short-term. All studies had a moderate or high risk of bias.
Conclusion: Compared to passive ankle-foot prostheses, quasi-passive and active prostheses significantly enhance the quality of life. Future research should investigate the long-term therapeutic benefits of prosthetics devices.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840272 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01128-5 | DOI Listing |
Sci Rep
July 2024
K. Lisa Yang Center for Bionics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, USA.
Ankle push-off power plays an important role in healthy walking, contributing to center-of-mass acceleration, swing leg dynamics, and accounting for 45% of total leg power. The majority of existing passive energy storage and return prostheses for people with below-knee (transtibial) amputation are stiffer than the biological ankle, particularly at slower walking speeds. Additionally, passive devices provide insufficient levels of energy return and push-off power, negatively impacting biomechanics of gait.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot
September 2023
Most commercial ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are passive structures that cannot modulate stiffness to assist with a diverse range of activities, such as stairs and ramps. It is sometimes possible to change the stiffness of passive AFOs through reassembly or benchtop adjustment, but they cannot change stiffness during use. Passive AFOs are also limited in their ankle mechanics and cannot replicate a biomimetic, nonlinear torque-angle relationship.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpert Rev Med Devices
November 2023
Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Introduction: Actuated lower limb prostheses, including powered (active) and semi-active (quasi-passive) joints, are endowed with controllable power and/or impedance, which can be advantageous to limb impairment individuals by improving locomotion mechanics and reducing the overall metabolic cost of ambulation. However, an increasing number of commercial and research-focused options have made navigating this field a daunting task for users, researchers, clinicians, and professionals.
Areas Covered: The present paper provides an overview of the latest trends and developments in the field of actuated lower-limb prostheses and corresponding technologies.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol
July 2023
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Assistive ankle-foot orthoses (AAFOs) are powerful solutions to assist or rehabilitate gait on humans. Existing AAFO technologies include passive, quasi-passive, and active principles to provide assistance to the users, and their mechanical configuration and control depend on the eventual support they aim for within the gait pattern. In this research we analyze the state-of-the-art of AAFO and classify the different approaches into clusters, describing their basis and working principles.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neurorobot
May 2023
Laboratory XoLab, Department of Advanced Robotics (ADVR), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Genova, Italy.
Wearable robots are becoming a valuable solution that helps injured, and elderly people regain mobility and improve clinical outcomes by speeding up the rehabilitation process. The XoSoft exosuit identified several benefits, including improvement of assistance, usability, and acceptance with a soft, modular, bio-mimetic, and quasi-passive exoskeleton. This study compares two assistive configurations: (i) a bilateral hip flexion (HA, hips-assistance) and (ii) a bilateral hip flexion combined with ankle plantarflexion (HAA, hips-ankles-assistance) with the main goal of evaluating compensatory actions and synergetic effects generated by the human- exoskeleton interaction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!