Performance of clear cell likelihood scores in characterizing solid renal masses at multiparametric MRI: an external validation study.

Abdom Radiol (NY)

Department of Radiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.

Published: March 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how accurately the clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) diagnoses clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and how closely different radiologists agree in their assessments.
  • It reviewed data from 79 patients with solid renal masses who had undergone imaging and biopsy from 2010 to 2020, excluding certain types of masses, and involved two radiologists independently scoring the cases.
  • Results showed that ccLS had high sensitivity and negative predictive value, correctly identifying a significant portion of ccRCC cases, but interobserver agreement between the radiologists was only moderate.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver agreement of ccLS in diagnosing clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods: This retrospective single-center study evaluated consecutive patients with solid renal masses who underwent mpMRI followed by percutaneous biopsy and/or surgical excision between January 2010 and December 2020. Predominantly (> 75%) cystic masses, masses with macroscopic fat and infiltrative masses were excluded. Two abdominal radiologists independently scored each renal mass according to the proposed ccLS algorithm. The diagnostic performance of ccLS categories for ccRCC was calculated using logistic regression modeling. Diagnostic accuracy for predicting ccRCC was calculated using 2 × 2 contingency tables. Interobserver agreement for ccLS was evaluated with Cohen's k statistic.

Results: A total of 79 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 12 [SD], 50 men) with 81 renal masses were evaluated. The mean size was 36 mm ± 28 (range 10-160). Of the renal masses included, 44% (36/81) were ccRCC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95). Using ccLS ≥ 4 to diagnose ccRCC, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 93% (95% CI 79, 99), 63% (95% CI 48, 77), and 67% (95% CI 58, 75), respectively. The negative predictive value of ccLS ≤ 2 was 93% (95% CI 64, 99). The proportion of ccRCC by ccLS category 1 to 5 were 10%, 0%, 10%, 57%, and 84%, respectively. Interobserver agreement was moderate (k = 0.47).

Conclusion: In this study, clear cell likelihood score had moderate interobserver agreement and resulted in 96% negative predictive value in excluding ccRCC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03799-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

renal masses
16
interobserver agreement
16
clear cell
12
cell likelihood
8
solid renal
8
agreement ccls
8
ccrcc calculated
8
93% 95%
8
negative predictive
8
masses
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!