Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000980 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Commentary: Relationships between screen time and childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a Mendelian randomization study.
Front Psychiatry
December 2024
Research Center for Child Mental Development, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Optimizing breast MRI diagnosis: the Kaiser Score's impact on reducing unnecessary biopsies.
Eur Radiol
January 2025
University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Letter to the editor: anticoagulation, photoselective vaporization of the prostate and safety: a propensity score-matched study.
World J Urol
December 2024
School of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Although concussion management and return to play/learn decision making focuses on reducing symptoms, there is growing interest in objective physiological approaches to treatment. Clinical and technological advancements have aided concussion management; however, the scientific study of the neurophysiology of concussion has not translated into its standard of care. This expert commentary is motivated by novel clinical applications of electroencephalographic-based neurofeedback approaches (eg, quantitative electroencephalography [QEEG]) for treating traumatic brain injury and emerging research interest in its translation for treating concussion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHow Should We Define Meaningful Improvement? A Commentary on Minimal Clinically Important Difference Assessment for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement in Total Joint Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds guide clinicians and researchers in determining whether changes in patient-reported outcome measures are truly meaningful from the patient's perspective. This article focuses on MCID calculation methods for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, two widely used patient-reported outcome measures in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. While distribution-based methods (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!