The right turn around: Penrose tourniquet application in paediatrics.

Introduction: Commercially available tourniquets are ill-suited for paediatric patients with limb circumferences smaller than the required mechanism, forcing surgeons to improvise. This study aimed to quantify pressures exerted by the Penrose tourniquet when applied on a phantom model and evaluate the intra-/inter-rater reproducibility of the technique previously proposed.

Methods: Eight calibrated pressure sensors were distributed evenly along the inner and outer circumference of a silicon-based model. A 30cm-by-3.2 cm ARGYLE Penrose drain, 4-by-4 gauze, marker and ruler were used. The optimal interval for arterial occlusion was determined to be 70% of limb circumference. The tourniquet was secured using two half-knots formed by gauze.

Results: Two-turns of the tourniquet about the model generated mean pressures (SD) of 209.43 (SD:35.98 mmHg) (95%CI: 195.85-224.00 mmHg) (outer-sensor) and 246.32 (SD:61.92 mmHg) (95%CI: 221.02-273.49 mmHg) (inner-sensor). Three-turns generated mean pressures of 302.07 (SD:23.98 mmHg) (95%CI: 292.29-312.53 mmHg) (outer-sensor) and 314.44 (SD:56.70 mmHg) (95%CI: 291.25-338.25 mmHg) (inner-sensor).

Conclusion: The Penrose tourniquet has clinical utility, particularly for patients where commercially available tourniquets are not suitable. Current application techniques generate inconsistent pressures. Using the existing model, further refinement can be done to improve the consistency and safety of the application. We recommend using intervals of slightly more than 70% of limb circumference and only two turns of the Penrose tourniquet during application.

Level Of Evidence: V.