A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Middle Rectal Artery: Revisited Anatomy and Surgical Implications of a Neglected Blood Vessel. | LitMetric

Background: Although the middle rectal artery is a relevant anatomical landmark for rectal resection and lateral lymph node dissection, descriptions of this entity are highly divergent.

Objective: Dissection, visualization, morphometry, and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the middle rectal artery to facilitate its management in surgery.

Design: Macroscopic dissection, histologic study, morphometric measurements, and virtual modeling.

Setting: University laboratory of applied surgical anatomy.

Patients: This study includes formalin-fixed hemipelvis specimens (n=37) obtained from body donors (age, 67-97 y).

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures are photo documentation of origin, trajectory, diameter, and branching pattern; immunolabeling of lymphatics; and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the middle rectal artery.

Results: The middle rectal artery was present in 71.4% of body donors (21.4% bilateral, 50% unilateral), originated from the anterior division of the internal iliac artery, and branched either from the internal pudendal artery (45.5%), the inferior gluteal artery (22.7%), the gluteal-pudendal trunk (22.7%), or a trifurcation (9.1%). One to 3 branches of varying diameters (0.5-3.5 mm) entered the mesorectum from the ventrolateral (35.7%), lateral (42.9%), or dorsolateral (21.4%) aspect. The middle rectal artery was accompanied by podoplanin-immunoreactive lymphatic vessels and gave off additional branches (81.8%) to the urogenital pelvic organs. Three-dimensional reconstruction revealed the complex course of the middle rectal artery from the pelvic sidewall through the pelvic nerve plexus and parietal pelvic fascia into the mesorectum.

Limitations: Findings retrieved from body donors may be prone to age- and fixation-related processes.

Conclusions: The investigation disclosed the rather high prevalence of the middle rectal artery, its 3-dimensional topographic anatomy, and its proximity to the autonomic pelvic nerves. These features play a role in the surgical management of this blood vessel. The data provide the anatomical rationale for the lateral lymphatic spread of rectal cancer and an anatomical basis for nerve-preserving lateral lymph node dissection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002531DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

middle rectal
32
rectal artery
28
body donors
12
artery
10
rectal
9
middle
8
blood vessel
8
lateral lymph
8
lymph node
8
node dissection
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!