Background: Transplant recipients require individualized tacrolimus doses to maximize graft survival. Multiple pediatric tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models incorporating CYP3A5 genotype and other covariates have been developed. Identifying the optimal popPK model is necessary for clinical implementation in pediatric solid organ transplant. The primary objective was to compare the dose prediction capabilities of the developed models in pediatric kidney and heart transplant recipients.
Methods: Pediatric kidney or heart transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus and available CYP3A5 genotype data were identified. The initial weight-based tacrolimus dose and first therapeutic tacrolimus dose were collected retrospectively. Three published popPK models were used to predict the tacrolimus dose required to achieve a tacrolimus trough concentration of 10 ng/mL. Model dose predictions were compared with the initial and first therapeutic doses using Friedman test. The first therapeutic dose was plotted against the model-predicted dose.
Results: The median initial dose approximately 2-fold lower than the first therapeutic dose for CYP3A5 expressers. The Chen et al model provided the closest estimates to the first therapeutic dose for kidney transplant recipients; however, all 3 models tended to underpredict the observed therapeutic dose. For heart transplant recipients, Andrews et al model predicted doses that were higher than the initial dose but similar to the actual therapeutic dose.
Conclusions: Weight-based tacrolimus dosing appears to underestimate the tacrolimus dose requirements. The development of a separate popPK model is necessary for heart transplant recipients. A genotype-guided strategy based on the Chen et al model provided the best estimates for doses in kidney transplant recipients and should be prospectively evaluated.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9832243 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001002 | DOI Listing |
Clin Transl Oncol
January 2025
Anhembi University Morumbi, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, 12235-181, Brazil.
Background: Immunosuppression might increase the risk of skin cancer in organ transplant recipients (OTRs), with azathioprine (AZA), exerting a fundamental role in the carcinogenesis of those tumors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address the risk of developing malignant skin neoplasms in OTRs undergoing immunosuppression with AZA.
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were searched for studies with OTRs who have a treatment regimen involving Azathioprine therapy after transplantation and that analyzed the emergence of skin neoplasia.
J Cyst Fibros
January 2025
Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Highly effective modulator therapies (HEMT) including ivacaftor (IVA) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) have transformed treatment for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). However, non-HEMT-responsive mutations are more common in pwCF of non-White race/ethnicity; introduction of HEMT might have exacerbated racial/ethnic disparities in CF care.
Methods: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all lung transplant candidates and recipients 05/2005-12/2022 and categorized them by diagnosis (CF/non-CF), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White/Black/Hispanic) and era [Pre-HEMT (2005-1/30/2012), IVA (1/31/2012-10/30/2019), ETI (10/31/2019-12/31/2022)].
J Heart Lung Transplant
January 2025
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44116.
Kidney Med
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Rationale & Objective: Nearly half of kidney transplant recipients develop allograft failure within 10 years of transplantation and experience high mortality, significant symptom burden, and complex communication challenges. These patients may benefit from palliative care, but palliative care is infrequently provided in this population. This study explores palliative care perceptions and needs among patients with poorly functioning and declining kidney allografts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!