Impact of the 2018 French two-score allocation scheme on the profile of heart transplantation candidates and recipients: Insights from a high-volume centre.

Arch Cardiovasc Dis

Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Cardiology Institute, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University Medical School, 75013 Paris, France; Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, Inserm, UMR-S970, 75015 Paris, France. Electronic address:

Published: February 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • In 2018, France introduced a new cardiac allograft allocation scheme to assess the risk of death for patients on the waiting list and after heart transplants.
  • A study at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital analyzed data from 2012 to 2021, involving 1098 candidates and 855 transplant recipients, comparing outcomes before and after the new scheme's implementation.
  • The update led to a decrease in candidates on inotropes and an increase in patients with worse kidney function and more severe conditions undergoing transplantation, yet overall post-transplant outcomes remained unchanged.

Article Abstract

Background: In 2018, a new cardiac allograft allocation scheme, based on an individual scoring system, considering the risk of death both on the waiting list and after heart transplantation, was implemented in France.

Aim: To assess the impact of this new scheme on the profile of transplantation candidates and recipients.

Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, we included consecutive patients listed and/or transplanted between 01 January 2012 and 30 September 2021 at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. Baseline characteristics of patients were retrieved from the national CRISTAL registry and were compared according to the type of allocation scheme (before or after 2018).

Results: A total of 1098 newly listed transplantation candidates and 855 transplant recipients were included. One-year mortality rates after listing and after transplantation were 12.4% and 20%, respectively. At listing, the proportion of candidates on inotropes significantly declined following the scheme update (26.3 versus 20.9%; P=0.038), reflecting a change in medical practice. At transplantation, recipients had worse kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate<60mL/min/1.73 m: old scheme, 29.7%; new scheme, 46.4%; P<0.001) and were more likely to be on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (33.5% versus 28.1%; P=0.080) under the new scheme, reflecting the prioritization of more severe patients. Outcomes after transplantation were not significantly influenced by the allocation system.

Conclusions: The implementation of the 2018 French allocation scheme had a limited impact on the profile of transplantation candidates, but selected more severe patients for transplantation without significant impact on outcomes after transplantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2022.11.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

allocation scheme
12
transplantation candidates
12
scheme profile
8
heart transplantation
8
transplantation
6
scheme
5
impact 2018
4
2018 french
4
french two-score
4
two-score allocation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!