Background: The T w sequence is a standard component of a prostate MRI examination; however, it is time-consuming, requiring multiple signal averages to achieve acceptable image quality.
Purpose/hypothesis: To determine whether a denoised, single-average T sequence (T -R) is noninferior to the standard multiaverage T sequence (T -S) in terms of lesion detection and PI-RADS score assessment.
Study Type: Retrospective.
Population: A total of 45 males (age range 60-75 years) who underwent clinically indicated prostate MRI examinations, 21 of whom had pathologically proven prostate cancer.
Field Strength/sequence: A 3 T; T w FSE, DWI with ADC maps, and dynamic contrast-enhanced images with color-coded perfusion maps. T -R images were created from the raw data utilizing a single "average" with iterative denoising.
Assessment: Nine readers randomly assessed complete exams including T -R and T -S images in separate sessions. PI-RADS version 2.1 was used. All readers then compared the T -R and T -S images side by side to evaluate subjective preference. An additional detailed image quality assessment was performed by three senior level readers.
Statistical Tests: Generalized linear mixed effects models for differences in lesion detection, image quality features, and overall preference between T -R and T -S sequences. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess reader agreement for all comparisons. A significance threshold of P = 0.05 was used for all statistical tests.
Results: There was no significant difference between sequences regarding identification of lesions with PI-RADS ≥3 (P = 0.10) or PI-RADS score (P = 0.77). Reader agreement was excellent for lesion identification (ICC = 0.84). There was no significant overall preference between the two sequences regarding image quality (P = 0.07, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.01]). Reader agreement was good regarding sequence preference (ICC = 0.62).
Data Conclusion: Use of single-average, denoised T -weighted images was noninferior in prostate lesion detection or PI-RADS scoring when compared to standard multiaverage T -weighted images.
Evidence Level: 3.
Technical Efficacy: Stage 3.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28577 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!