The use of blood products to resuscitate injured and massively bleeding patients in the prehospital and early in-hospital phase of the resuscitation is increasing. Using group O red blood cells (RBC) and low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) avoids an immediate hemolytic reaction from recipient's naturally occurring anti-A and - B, but choosing the RhD type for these products is more nuanced and requires the balancing of product availability and survival benefit against the risk of D-alloimmunization, especially in females of childbearing potential (FCP) due to the possible future occurrence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Recent models have estimated the risk of fetal/neonatal death from HDFN resulting from D-alloimmunization of an FCP during her trauma resuscitation at between 0-6.5% depending on her age at the time of the transfusion and other societal factors including trauma mortality, her age when she becomes pregnant, frequency of different genotypes in the population, and the probability that the woman will have children with different fathers; this is counterbalanced by an approximately 24% risk of death from hemorrhagic shock. This review will discuss the different models of HDFN outcomes following RhD-positive transfusion as well as the results of recent surveys where the public was asked about their preferences for urgent transfusion in light of the risks of fetal/neonatal adverse events.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2022.2161215DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk d-alloimmunization
8
hemolytic disease
8
disease fetus
8
fetus newborn
8
rhd-positive transfusion
8
"d"eadly thought
4
risk
4
thought risk
4
d-alloimmunization hemolytic
4
newborn rhd-positive
4

Similar Publications

Background: Several interventions provided to newborns at birth or within 24 h after birth have been proven critical in improving neonatal survival and other birth outcomes. We aimed to provide an update on the effectiveness and safety of these interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Summary: Following a comprehensive scoping of the literature, we updated or re-analyzed the LMIC-specific evidence for included topics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

 The rhesus factor D (RhD)-negative patients who give birth to an RhD-positive newborn or who are otherwise exposed to RhD-positive red blood cells are at risk of developing anti-D antibodies. These antibodies may cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). During pregnancy, prevention of alloimmunization is completed with a Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIg).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

RhD-Alloimmunization in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Patients.

Transfus Med Rev

October 2024

Standards Development and Quality Initiatives, Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies, Bethesda, MD, USA.

The actual risk of providing RhD-positive units to RhD-negative recipients remains debatable. There is no standard of care in the United States (US) to guide transfusion decisions regarding RhD type for patients with an unknown blood type, except for women of childbearing age and neonates. The risk of alloantibody formation by an RhD-negative patient exposed to RhD-positive blood is reported to be from 3% to 70%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Why do RhD negative pregnant women still become anti-D immunized despite prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin?

Transfus Apher Sci

August 2024

Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address:

Maternal allo-anti-D in RhD negative pregnant women may cause mild to severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Although several other antibodies may also destroy red blood cells of the fetus and newborn, preventive measures with anti-D immunoglobulin are only available for D antigen. Targeted antenatal care together with postpartum prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin has significantly reduced the D-alloimmunization risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does high body mass index (>25 kg/m) or weight (>80 kg) reduce the effectiveness of anti-D prophylaxis in Rh(D)-negative pregnant women? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vox Sang

September 2024

Thrombosis and Vascular Diseases Laboratory, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Background And Objectives: Haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN) occurs when maternal antibodies, often triggered by foetal antigens, destroy foetal and neonatal red blood cells. Factors like antibody strength, quantity and gestational age influence HDFN severity. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) has significantly reduced HDFN cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!