AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence and safety of a generic version of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared to the reference product, Caelyx, in breast cancer patients.
  • A single-dose, randomized crossover design was used, with 48 patients receiving both the test and reference formulations at specified intervals, tracking various blood measurements over 14 days.
  • Results indicated that the generic formulation was bioequivalent to Caelyx, as demonstrated by overlapping confidence intervals, and no significant safety differences were noted between the two treatments, despite a high occurrence of laboratory abnormalities.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) and safety of a generic pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) formulation with the reference product Caelyx.

Methods: A multicenter, single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in patients with breast cancer. For each period, the patients were administered with the test or the reference PLD intravenously at a dose of 50 mg/m. C, AUC and AUC for free, and encapsulated doxorubicin (doxorubicin) and partial AUC (AUC, AUC) for encapsulated doxorubicin were evaluated in 17 blood samples taken predose, and increasing time intervals over the following 14 days in each period. A washout period of 28-35 days was observed before crossing over.

Results: 48 patients were enrolled and randomised, of which 44 were included and analysed in bioequivalence set (BES). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of C, AUC and AUC for free doxorubicin and encapsulated doxorubicin all fall within the bioequivalent range of 80% to 125%. The 90% CIs of GMR of partial AUC (AUC, AUC48) for encapsulated doxorubicin also fall within the bioequivalent range. 48 patients were all included in the safety set (SS). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to T and R was 95.8% (46/48) and 97.8% (45/46) respectively. The highest incidence of TEAEs was various laboratory abnormalities. 2 patients withdrew due to T-drug-related AEs. Only one patient experienced serious adverse events and no death occurred in this study. There were no significant differences between the safety profiles of the generic formulation and Caelyx.

Conclusions: Bioequivalence between the test and the reference products was established for free and encapsulated doxorubicin.

Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier [CTR20210375].

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9810385PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1070001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

auc auc
20
encapsulated doxorubicin
16
auc
9
bioequivalence safety
8
safety generic
8
doxorubicin
8
breast cancer
8
test reference
8
auc free
8
free encapsulated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!