Purpose: To investigate differential clinical outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for cT1b renal tumors.
Materials And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 119 patients who had undergone PN (n = 90) or PCA (n = 29) for cT1b renal tumors. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used for balancing patient demographics, including renal function and tumor complexity. Perioperative complications, renal function preservation rates, and oncological outcomes such as local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were compared using IPW-adjusted restricted mean survival times (RMSTs).
Results: PCA was more likely to be selected for octogenarians (odds ratio: 11.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.33-45.1). During the median follow-up of 43 months in the PCA group and 36.5 months in the PN group, unablated local residue or local recurrence was noted in 6 patients in the PCA group and local recurrence was noted in 4 patients in the PN groups. Of the 6 patients in the PCA group, 4 underwent salvage PCA, and local control had been achieved at the last visit. In the IPW-adjusted population, PCA had significantly worse local recurrence-free survival compared with PN (IPW-adjusted RMST difference: -22.7 months, 95% CI: -45.3 to -0.4, P = 0.046). IPW-adjusted RMST for metastasis-free survival (P = 0.23), cancer-specific survival (P = 0.77), and overall survival (P = 0.11) did not differ between PCA and PN. In addition, PN was not a predictor for local control failure at the last visit (odds ratio: 0.30, 95%CI: 0.05-1.29). There were no statistically significant differences between PN and PCA in renal function preservation or overall/severe complication rates.
Conclusions: In patients with cT1b renal tumor, although the local recurrence rate is higher for PCA than for PN, PCA provides comparable distant oncologic outcomes. PCA can be an alternative treatment option for elderly, comorbid patients, even those with cT1b renal tumors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.11.025 | DOI Listing |
Hinyokika Kiyo
July 2024
The Department of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Arch Esp Urol
September 2024
Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
JCO Precis Oncol
September 2024
Urology Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY.
Purpose: Understanding the specific tumor characteristics associated with detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is critical for informing future studies aiming to establish the clinical utility of such testing. We characterized the pathologic and clinical features associated with preoperatively detectable ctDNA in patients with renal masses suspicious for RCC.
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy for nonmetastatic suspected RCC (cT1b-T3) during 2022-2023 had prospectively collected tumor-informed ctDNA analyses conducted preoperatively and postoperatively.
Cancer Diagn Progn
September 2024
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Background/aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score as a predictor of split renal function deterioration after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).
Patients And Methods: A total of 30 patients who underwent RAPN were identified retrospectively. The parameters evaluated included patient characteristics, tumor diameter, MAP score, warm ischemic time (WIT), and renal function.
World J Oncol
August 2024
Urology Surgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Background: Earlier studies have juxtaposed different laparoscopic methods for treating renal tumors; however, extensive evidence with a particular focus on large kidney tumors remains lacking. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the perioperative outcomes, kidney performance, and cancer-related results of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for treating extensive, localized, non-metastatic kidney tumors (cT1b-cT2N0M0).
Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases from database inception until December 2023 for relevant studies.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!