A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A hybrid ultrafiltration membrane process using a low-cost laterite based adsorbent for efficient arsenic removal. | LitMetric

A hybrid ultrafiltration membrane process using a low-cost laterite based adsorbent for efficient arsenic removal.

Chemosphere

Department of Polymer and Process Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Saharanpur Campus, Saharanpur 247001, UP, India. Electronic address:

Published: March 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Adsorption is effective for arsenic removal, but it needs to be paired with other processes like low-pressure membrane systems for large-scale water treatment.
  • A pilot study combines a low-cost laterite-derived adsorbent with cross-flow ultrafiltration to develop a strategy for treating arsenic-contaminated water, using two configurations with and without sand filtration.
  • Results show that the Ads-UF method maintained a greater permeate flux compared to Ads-SF-UF, and the spent adsorbent was safe for disposal and retained its original properties.

Article Abstract

Adsorption has proven to be most effective for arsenic removal. But standalone adsorption cannot cater to the need for large-scale treatment in centralized water supply systems. Combining adsorption with other low-pressure membrane processes may aid in scaling up and intensifying the overall arsenic removal. In the present pilot study, a low-cost laterite-derived adsorbent (LDA) has been used in combination with cross-flow ultrafiltration (Ads-UF) to develop a strategy suitable for remediation of arsenic-contaminated water. Effect of adsorbent particles on permeate flux has been assessed at different transmembrane pressure (0.2-0.6 MPa). Two different hybrid configurations, with and without intermediate sand filtration (SF), i.e. Ads-SF-UF and Ads-UF, were considered. Resistance-in-series and combined complete pore block-cake layer models have been used to understand the flux profiles. In the case of arsenic-spiked groundwater, it was observed that flux decline, at 0.6 MPa, was 28% higher with Ads-UF during a 12 h run compared to Ads-SF-UF. Spent LDA retrieved from the sand column was found to retain the elemental composition as that of the unused LDA (as per FT-IR and EDX) and was considered safe for disposal based on Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Cost estimation for a facility with 200 m/day treatment capacity has also been presented.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137685DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

arsenic removal
12
hybrid ultrafiltration
4
ultrafiltration membrane
4
membrane process
4
process low-cost
4
low-cost laterite
4
laterite based
4
based adsorbent
4
adsorbent efficient
4
efficient arsenic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!