Fencing amplifies individual differences in movement with implications on survival for two migratory ungulates.

J Anim Ecol

Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Published: March 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Fences are becoming recognized as key structures affecting animal movement and behavior, particularly influencing how animals like pronghorn and mule deer navigate landscapes.
  • The study analyzed the effects of fence density on the movements, space usage, and survival of both species, employing advanced methods to categorize their responses when encountering fences.
  • Findings revealed that higher fence densities led to increased individual behavioral differences in response to fences, affecting mule deer's space use and survival rates, while pronghorn did not show significant survival impacts; managing fence density may mitigate behavioral shifts in these animals.

Article Abstract

Fences have recently been recognized as one of the most prominent linear infrastructures on earth. As animals traverse fenced landscapes, they adjust movement behaviours to optimize resource access while minimizing energetic costs of coping with fences. Examining individual responses is key for connecting localized fence effects with population dynamics. We investigated the multi-scale effects of fencing on animal movements, space use and survival of 61 pronghorn and 96 mule deer on a gradient of fence density in Wyoming, USA. Taking advantage of the recently developed Barrier Behaviour Analysis, we classified individual movement responses upon encountering fences (i.e. barrier behaviours). We adopted the reaction norm framework to jointly quantify individual plasticity and behavioural types of barrier behaviours, as well as behaviour syndromes between barrier behaviours and animal space use. We also assessed whether barrier behaviours affect individual survival. Our results highlighted a high-level individual plasticity encompassing differences in the degree and direction of barrier behaviours for both pronghorn and mule deer. Additionally, these individual differences were greater at higher fence densities. For mule deer, fence density determined the correlation between barrier behaviours and space use and was negatively associated with individual survival. However, these relationships were not statistically significant for pronghorn. By integrating approaches from movement ecology and behavioural ecology with the emerging field of fence ecology, this study provides new evidence that an extraordinarily widespread linear infrastructure uniquely impacts animals at the individual level. Managing landscape for lower fence densities may help prevent irreversible behavioural shifts for wide-ranging animals in fenced landscapes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13879DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

barrier behaviours
24
mule deer
12
individual
9
individual differences
8
fenced landscapes
8
pronghorn mule
8
fence density
8
individual plasticity
8
individual survival
8
fence densities
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!