Background/aim: T2 weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the gold standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) staging. The potential benefit of functional imaging, as diffusion-weighted MR (DWI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), could be considered for treatment intensification strategies. Dose intensification resulted in better pathological complete response (pCR) rates. This study evaluated the inter-observer agreement between two radiation oncologists, and the difference in gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation in simulation-CT, T2-MR, DWI-MR, and PET-CT in patients with LARC.
Patients And Methods: Two radiation oncologists prospectively delineated GTVs of 24 patients on simul-CT (CT), T2-weighted MR (T2), echo planar b1000 DWI (DWI) and PET-CT (PET). Observers' agreement was assessed using Dice index. Kruskal-Wallis test assessed differences between methods.
Results: Mean CT, T2, DWI, and PET were 41.3±26.9 cc, 25.9±15.2 cc, 21±14.8 cc, and 37.7±27.7 cc for the first observer, and 42.2±27.9 cc, 27.6±16.9 cc, 19.9±14.9cc, and 34.8±24.3 cc for the second observer, respectively. Mean Dice index was 0.85 for CT, 0.84 for T2, 0.82 for DWI, and 0.89 for PET, representative of almost perfect agreement. Kruskal-Wallis test showed a statistically significant difference between methods (p=0.009). Dunn test showed there were differences between DWI vs. PET (p=0.040) and DWI vs. CT (p=0.008).
Conclusion: DWI resulted in smaller volume delineation compared to CT, T2-MR, and PET-CT functional images. Almost perfect agreements were reported for each imaging modality between two observers. DWI-MR seems to remain the optimal strategy for boost volume delineation for dose escalation in patients with LARC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9843791 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13095 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!