Altering magnetic field strength impacts the assessment of diaphragmatic function using cervical magnetic stimulation.

Quantifying diaphragm neuromuscular function using cervical magnetic stimulation (CMS) typically uses only a single stimulator (1-Stim) which may be inadequate to maximally stimulate the phrenic nerves. We questioned if using two stimulators (2-Stim) together alters diaphragm neuromuscular function at baseline and following inspiratory pressure threshold loading. Six (n = 3 female) healthy young participants were instrumented with esophageal and gastric balloon tipped catheters and electrodes over the 7-8th intercostal space. With either 1-Stim or 2-Stim an incremental protocol, where the stimulator intensity was progressively increased was completed prior to a series of potentiated twitches. The inspiratory threshold loading test consisted of loaded breathing to failure. Compared to 1-Stim, 2-Stim resulted in significantly greater unpotentiated Pdi and M-waves during the incremental protocol (both p < 0.01). Similarly, 2-Stim resulted in greater potentiated Pdi (31 ± 8 vs. 41 ± 9 cmHO; p = 0.02) and M-waves (6.4 ± 2.9 vs. 8.6 ± 2.4 V; p = 0.02). Our findings suggest that CMS using 1-Stim is unlikely to generate a sufficient magnetic field to maximally stimulate the phrenic nerves and may underestimate diaphragm function.