A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Simulation training for urgent postnatal fetal tracheal balloon removal: Two learning methods. | LitMetric

Objective: In fetuses with severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia, fetal endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) with balloon increases survival and reduces morbidity. Balloon removal is often scheduled electively. In urgent cases, in-utero removal is impossible and removal immediately after delivery has to occur, posing risk of death from airway obstruction. Medical staff need training in urgent removal. Ideal training method is unclear; thus, we compared the performance of two groups trained by different methods.

Methods: 24 medical students were randomly assigned to two different learning methods for removal: Group 1 (in-person lecture) and Group 2 (online video). Both methods presented the same information: endoscopic instrument set-up, anatomical landmarks for intubation, and balloon removal. All participants were evaluated using the same instruments and high-fidelity simulator, comparing time for instrument set-up and simulate balloon removal (including removal attempts).

Results: Group 1 took significantly less time for instrument set-up compared to Group 2 [62 (30-92) secs vs 81 (57-108) secs; p < 0.01)]; no difference in time to intubate and locate the balloon [75 (50-173) secs vs 92 (32-232) secs; p 0.42], or number of attempts.

Conclusion: There was no difference between video training and in-person training with regards to the time taken to locate the FETO balloon in the trachea and to simulate its removal.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

balloon removal
16
instrument set-up
12
removal
9
training urgent
8
learning methods
8
time instrument
8
balloon
5
simulation training
4
urgent postnatal
4
postnatal fetal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!