[Application value of CNV-seq for the prenatal diagnosis of women with high-risk pregnancies].

Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi

Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430016, China.

Published: January 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the effectiveness of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) for detecting fetal anomalies in high-risk pregnant women.
  • A total of 271 women were examined, revealing a 20.66% detection rate for pathogenic CNVs using CNV-seq compared to 19.19% for karyotyping, indicating that CNV-seq is slightly more effective.
  • CNV-seq was particularly helpful in identifying more likely pathogenic CNVs and variants of unknown significance (VUS) in mothers with alternative risk factors, suggesting it may serve as a valuable first-tier diagnostic tool in prenatal settings.

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the application value of copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) for women with a high risk for fetal anomalies.

Methods: Based on the results of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), 271 high-risk pregnant women were divided into NIPT positive group (n = 83) and other anomaly group (advanced age, high risk by serological screening, repeated NIPT failure, adverse pregnancy history, abnormal ultrasound finding, and abnormal phenotype) (n = 188). CNV-seq was carried out to detect copy number variations (CNVs) in amniocytic DNA from the two groups of pregnant women, and karyotyping analysis of the amniotic cells was carried out for verification and comparison.

Results: The amniocytes from 271 pregnant women were detected. The detection rate was 20.66% (56/271) for pathogenic CNVs by CNV-seq and 19.19% (52/271) for pathogenic karyotypes by karyotyping analysis. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CNV-seq had shown that, compared with NIPT positive group, the detection rates for likely pathogenic CNVs and variants of unknown significance (VUS) in other abnormality group were significantly higher [2.41%(2/83) vs. 5.32%(10/188)](P < 0.05).

Conclusion: CNV-seq can well suit the first-tier diagnosis for pregnant women suspected for fetal abnormality. In prenatal diagnosis settings, CNV-seq can identify additional and clinically significant cytogenetic abnormalities. In those with other abnormalities, the detection rates for likely pathogenic CNVs and VUS are higher than with the NIPT positive cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20211209-00976DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pregnant women
16
nipt positive
12
pathogenic cnvs
12
prenatal diagnosis
8
copy number
8
high risk
8
positive group
8
karyotyping analysis
8
detection rates
8
rates pathogenic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!