Making a move: Using simulation to identify latent safety threats before the care of injured patients in a new physical space.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery (M.K., R.A.F., M.D.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Surgery (M.K., R.A.F.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Emergency Medicine (M.K., S.D.B., G.L.G., B.T.K.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Center for Simulation and Research (B.M., G.L.K., S.M., S.D.B., G.L.G., B.T.K.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics (G.L.G., B.T.K.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; and James M. Anderson Center for Health System Excellence (M.K., R.A.F.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Published: September 2023

Background: In today's rapidly changing health care environment, hospitals are expanding into newly built spaces. Preserving patient safety by identifying latent safety threats (LSTs) in advance of opening a new physical space is key to continued excellent care. At our level 1 pediatric trauma center, the hospital undertook a 5-year project to build a critical care tower, including a new emergency department with five trauma bays. To allow for identification and mitigation of LSTs before opening, we performed simulation-based clinical systems testing.

Methods: Eight simulation scenarios were developed, based on actual patient presentations, incorporating a variety of injury patterns. Scenarios included workflow and movement from the helipad and squad entrance as well as to radiology, the operating room, and the pediatric intensive care unit. A multiple resuscitation scenario was also designed to test the use of all five bays simultaneously. Multidisciplinary high-fidelity simulations were conducted in the new tower. Key trauma and emergency department stakeholders facilitated all sessions, using a structured framework for systems integration debriefing framework and failure mode and effect analysis to identify and prioritize LSTs, respectively.

Results: Eight sessions were conducted for 2 months. A total of 201 staff participated, including trauma surgeons, respiratory therapists, nurses, emergency physicians, x-ray technicians, pharmacists, emergency medical services, and operating room staff. In total, 118 LSTs (average of 14.8/session) were identified. Latent safety threats were categorized. An action plan for mitigation was developed after applying failure mode and effects analysis prioritization scores (based on severity, probability, and ease of detection).

Conclusion: Systems-focused trauma simulations identified a large number of LSTs before the opening of a new critical care building. Identification of LSTs is feasible and facilitates mitigation before actual patient care begins, improving patient safety.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003865DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

latent safety
12
safety threats
12
physical space
8
critical care
8
emergency department
8
lsts opening
8
actual patient
8
operating room
8
failure mode
8
care
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!