A Prospective Audit Comparing Optos Widefield Imaging to Fundus Examination for Von Hippel-Lindau Retinal Screening.

Background Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder caused by germline mutations at chromosome in the VHLtumour suppressor gene. Retinal manifestations include capillary haemangiomas that develop in up to 80% of gene carriers. Lifelong retinal surveillance involves yearly assessment usually by fundoscopy and often as part of a VHL multidisciplinary clinic. Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging is now becoming more widely used in virtual retinal screening clinics. We aimed to assess discrepancies in the pickup rate of angioma and angiomatous-associated disease between slit-lamp fundoscopy and Optos ultra-widefield imaging. Methodology A total of 49 patients had both Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging and slit-lamp fundoscopy over 16 months in VHL retinal surveillance clinics at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Optos images were analysed for image quality and presence of angioma(s) by a Consultant Ophthalmologist who was masked to the fundoscopy findings. The pickup rate was compared between slit-lamp fundoscopy and Optos imaging. Results In total, data on 94 eyes were collected. Of the total Optos retinal images, 12.8% were positive for angiomas compared to 11.7% from the slit-lamp examination. There was a discrepancy of 1.1% (one value) where the Optos image analysis suggested a possible angioma, which was not identified on slit-lamp examination. Optos imaging identified all angiomas in this cohort. Conclusions Optos imaging was non-inferior to slit-lamp examination in this sample of 94 eyes. In the current COVID-19 climate, reducing clinician-patient interaction is important. This research supports providing retinal imaging as an acceptable alternative to the yearly slit-lamp fundus examination.