A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Machine learning-based prediction of infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A multi-center study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study explores using machine learning (ML) to estimate infarct size (IS) in STEMI patients as a more affordable alternative to the expensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) method.
  • - Researchers analyzed data from 315 patients and employed various ML algorithms, discovering that random forest (RF) outperformed linear regression (LR) in predicting IS, indicating ML's potential for more accurate assessments.
  • - The study concluded that ML-derived IS is significantly associated with adverse remodeling in the heart, suggesting that ML methods could serve as a reliable tool for evaluating IS during the acute phase of a heart attack.

Article Abstract

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the gold standard for measuring infarct size (IS). However, this method is expensive and requires a specially trained technologist to administer. We therefore sought to quantify the IS using machine learning (ML) based analysis on clinical features, which is a convenient and cost-effective alternative to CMR.

Methods And Results: We included 315 STEMI patients with CMR examined one week after morbidity in final analysis. After feature selection by XGBoost on fifty-six clinical features, we used five ML algorithms (random forest (RF), light gradient boosting decision machine, deep forest, deep neural network, and stacking) to predict IS with 26 (selected by XGBoost with information gain greater than average level of 56 features) and the top 10 features, during which 5-fold cross-validation were used to train and optimize models. We then evaluated the value of actual and ML-IS for the prediction of adverse remodeling. Our finding indicates that MLs outperform the linear regression in predicting IS. Specifically, the RF with five predictors identified by the exhaustive method performed better than linear regression (LR) with 10 indicators (R of RF: 0.8; LR: 0). The finding also shows that both actual and ML-IS were independently associated with adverse remodeling. ML-IS ≥ 21% was associated with a twofold increase in the risk of LV remodeling (P < 0.01) compared with patients with reference IS (1st tertile).

Conclusion: ML-based methods can predict IS with widely available clinical features, which provide a proof-of-concept tool to quantitatively assess acute phase IS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.12.037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infarct size
8
clinical features
8
actual ml-is
8
adverse remodeling
8
linear regression
8
machine learning-based
4
learning-based prediction
4
prediction infarct
4
size patients
4
patients st-segment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!