The effect of adenomyosis types on clinical outcomes of IVF embryo transfer after ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol.

Reprod Biomed Online

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital Beijing 100000, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Peking University Third Hospital) Beijing 100000, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education (Peking University) Beijing 100000, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology Beijing 100000, China; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan City 030000, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics Beijing 100000, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Science Beijing 100000, China. Electronic address:

Published: February 2023

Research Question: What is the effect of adenomyosis types on IVF and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) after ultra-long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol?

Design: Patients who underwent the first cycle of IVF-ET with ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol were included in this retrospective cohort study. They were divided into three groups: (A) 428 patients with diffuse adenomyosis; (B) 718 patients with focal adenomyosis; and (C) 519 patients with tubal infertility. Reproduction outcomes were analysed.

Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with focal adenomyosis and tubal infertility, diffuse adenomyosis was negatively associated with clinical pregnancy and live birth (clinical pregnancy: A versus B: OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.539 to 0.931, P = 0.013; A versus C: OR 0.663, 95% CI 0.489 to 0.899, P = 0.008; live birth: A versus B: OR 0.530, 95% CI 0.385 to 0.730, P < 0.001; A versus C: OR 0.441, 95% CI 0.313 to 0.623, P < 0.001), but positively associated with miscarriage (A versus B: OR 1.727, 95% CI 1.056 to 2.825, P = 0.029; A versus C: OR 2.549, 95% CI 1.278 to 5.082, P = 0.008). Compared with patients with tubal infertility, focal adenomyosis was also a risk factor for miscarriage (B versus C: OR 1.825, 95% CI 1.112 to 2.995, P = 0.017).

Conclusions: Compared with patients with focal adenomyosis or tubal infertility, the reproduction outcomes of IVF-ET in patients with diffuse adenomyosis seems to be worse.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

focal adenomyosis
16
tubal infertility
16
gnrh agonist
12
diffuse adenomyosis
12
adenomyosis
9
adenomyosis types
8
ivf embryo
8
embryo transfer
8
ultra-long gnrh
8
agonist protocol
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!