Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Accurate estimation of kidney size and volume in the solitary functioning kidney is crucial because of a higher risk of developing kidney injury. MRI is an accurate method and is suitable for kidney volume measurement. Usually, axial axis images and measurement methods are preferred for kidney volume measurements. However, the anteroposterior diameter of the kidney is smaller than the longitudinal diameter, meaning that imaging in the coronal axis could provide needed information in a shorter time, enabling imaging of younger patients without sedation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare coronal and axial axis kidney volume measurement methods and evaluate intra-observer and inter-observer reliability.
Methods: Axial axis T2W and coronal axis FIESTA images of kidneys were obtained with 10 mm slice thickness and no slice gap in pediatric patients with congenital solitary kidneys. Free-hand manual tracing was used to calculate volumes in both methods. Images were analyzed by two operators with different levels of experience. The expert operator computed solitary kidney volume twice in both methods for the intra-observer reliability, while the beginner operator's measurements were used for the inter-observer reliability.
Results: High intra-observer (0.965 for axial and 0.972 for coronal) and inter-observer reliability were revealed (0.964 for axial and 0.963 for the coronal) for both measurement methods.
Conclusion: The coronal plane volume measurement method, which has a significantly shorter examination and post-processing time, is a highly reproducible and reliable method that can enable volume measurement with MRI in younger children, as the imaging time will be shortened. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05858-x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!