A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of the predictive power of the 2005 and 2010 Caprini risk assessment models for deep vein thrombosis in Chinese orthopedic patients at admission: A prospective cohort study. | LitMetric

Introduction: Several DVT risk assessment tools have been developed and validated to stratify the patients. The 2005 and 2010 Caprini risk assessment models (RAMs) proved reliable in detecting deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and are widely used worldwide. Although the 2010 version was recently modified, the 2005 version is still more exact and popular in the surgical population. This study aimed to compare the predictive power of the 2005 and 2010 Caprini RAMs in Chinese orthopedic patients at admission and describe the incidence of DVT during hospitalization.

Study Design: This prospective cohort study involved 2733 patients from the Arthritis Clinic and Research Center, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Orthopedic Oncology Department, and Spinal Surgery Department of Peking University People's Hospital from September 2018 to January 2019. The DVT risk scores and levels were determined for all patients using the 2005 and 2010 Caprini RAMs at admission. The sensitivity and specificity of the two tools were calculated. The patients were divided into the screened and unscreened groups according to whether or not a Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was performed. Depending upon the DUS results, the patients were divided into the DVT and non-DVT groups. The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated to compare the predictive power.

Results: Eighty-four patients had DVT in the four orthopedic departments, and the incidence of DVT was 3.1 %-17.2 %. The scores between the 2005 and 2010 Caprini RAMs differed (P < 0.001) among orthopedic patients at admission. Among DVT patients, the highest-risk patients accounted for 63.5 % and 52.9 % based on the 2005 and 2010 Caprini RAMs, respectively. The AUCs of the 2005 and 1020 Caprini RAMs were 0.669 ± 0.030 and 0.648 ± 0.032, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two ROC curves (P = 0.164).

Conclusion: The 2005 and 2010 Caprini RAMs showed a similar predictive power in detecting DVT, but neither met the high sensitivity criteria for screening DVT in orthopedic patients. The incidence of DVT in orthopedic patients was relatively high during hospitalization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2022.11.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

2005 2010
20
2010 caprini
20
risk assessment
12
caprini rams
12
predictive power
8
power 2005
8
caprini risk
8
assessment models
8
deep vein
8
vein thrombosis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!